Violate the principle of relativity?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
4 replies · 2K views
tkm2002
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a water pipe, the light moves in the same direction of the water flow. It is
determined that the speed of light is dependent on the speed of water flow. Does
that violate the principle of relativity?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


why the speed of light is dependent?
I know it should not be violate the principle of relativity but I don't know how to explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are looking at a famous relativity example.

A distinction must be made between "speed of light (in a given medium)" and "speed of light in a vacuum (the speed limit of the universe)". I call the latter the "information speed limit".

I can suggest some more if you want, but that nugget of info above may be useful to you :).

EDIT: Actually, that is a downright awful attempt at being helpful, let's see if I can do better. You need to know about velocity addition formulae to answer the question. If you have tried all of that to no avail, then the water stuff is known as the fizeau experiment (books and interwebs know all about it)
 
Last edited:
tkm2002 said:
In a water pipe, the light moves in the same direction of the water flow. It is determined that the speed of light is dependent on the speed of water flow. Does that violate the principle of relativity?

Hi tkm2002! :smile:

No, it confirms the principle of relativity …

the v(1 ± 1/n2) formula is what special relativity predicts (by adding or subtracting v, the speed of the water, to c/n, the speed of light in the water) …

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fizeau_experiment#Derivation_in_special_relativity" :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Special Relativity has a formula for "adding" velocities.

That formula is different from ordinary adding, but it agrees with the results of Fizeau's experiment …

so Fizeau's experiment does not violate Special Relativity, but confirms it.

See that link for details. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Principle of relativity in the proof of invariance of interval
  • Mike_bb
  • · Replies 53 ·
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
53
Undergrad Principle of relativity and Galileo's group
  • HighPhy
  • · Replies 10 ·
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
High School Principle of Relativity: Classical Physics Example
  • abdossamad2003
  • · Replies 3 ·
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Undergrad Principle of relativity for proper accelerating frame of reference
  • cianfa72
  • · Replies 144 ·
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
144
Undergrad Apparent Violations of Principle of Relativity?
  • BruceAW
  • · Replies 2 ·
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Undergrad Principle of relativity: active vs passive point of view
  • cianfa72
  • · Replies 29 ·
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
High School Maxwell's EM Theory vs Principle of Relativity
  • HAF
  • · Replies 6 ·
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Undergrad Questions about the general principle of relativity
  • Frank Castle
  • · Replies 5 ·
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Undergrad Is the Principle of Relativity different for different theories?
  • Pushoam
  • · Replies 3 ·
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Einstein; The principle of relativity and the law of propagation of light.
  • Shad0w
  • · Replies 1 ·
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1