Viscosity & Drag: Linear Coeff & Medium Density

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vaal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag Viscosity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between viscosity, drag coefficients, and medium density, particularly in the context of linear drag and Stokes' law. Participants explore how these factors interact and the implications for drag force in different media.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the linear drag coefficient is solely a function of object size and medium viscosity, questioning how it can be independent of medium density.
  • Another participant clarifies that while the drag coefficient may be independent of density, the drag force itself is dependent on density, referencing the drag force equation.
  • A participant emphasizes the context of linear drag at small Reynolds numbers, linking to Stokes' law.
  • Another participant argues that Stokes' law explicitly shows drag as a function of terminal velocity, which is influenced by density.
  • A different participant points out that classical mechanics literature states drag force is proportional to velocity, with the drag coefficient defined in terms of viscosity and object size.
  • One participant explains that in Stokes flow, the low velocity assumption means drag is primarily viscous, with density affecting terminal velocity but not the drag coefficient itself.
  • A later reply acknowledges the mathematical reasoning presented and expresses difficulty in reconciling the concept that density does not affect viscosity despite being related to the number of interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between drag coefficients, viscosity, and density. There is no consensus on how these factors interact, particularly regarding the independence of the drag coefficient from density.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of the relationships between viscosity, drag, and density, with references to specific conditions like low Reynolds numbers and assumptions made in Stokes flow. Some participants note the limitations of their sources and the need for clearer understanding of the underlying physics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying fluid dynamics, particularly in the context of drag forces and the behavior of objects in viscous media.

Vaal
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
The linear drag coefficient is a function only of object size and medium viscosity. Multiply sources say viscosity of air is independent of pressure and density. How can the linear drag be independent of density of the medium? It seems like less dense medium should mean fewer collision and in turn less drag force. What am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the coefficient may be independent of density but the drag force depends on density. F=0.5 * density * speed^2 * drag coefficient * area. So yes, in denser medium there is higher drag force. ( source: wikipedia, i took the formula from there )
 
It is dependent on density. Stokes' Law shows drag explicitly as a function of terminal velocity, and that terminal velocity is a function of the density. It even shows this in the article you linked.
 
The article I linked may have not been the best example, I think it is referring to the force at terminal velocity (notice that a general v is no were in the expression). Classical Mechanics by Taylor explicitly says drag force is b*v and in problem 2.2 says b is given by 3pi*n*D where d is diamante of a sphere and n is the viscosity.
 
Right well in the case of Stokes flow, the velocity is so low that it is assumed that all drag is viscous in nature, which means that the density has no part in it. It only affects the terminal velocity. With such a low flow velocity, viscous effects are much, much more significant than pressure and density effects.

Consider the nondimensional Navier-Stokes equations:

\frac{\partial u_i^{*}}{\partial t^{*}} + u_j^{*}\frac{\partial u_i^{*}}{\partial x_j^{*}} = -\frac{\partial p^{*}}{\partial x_i^{*}} + \frac{1}{\textrm{Re}}\frac{\partial^2 u_i^{*}}{\partial x_j^{*} \partial x_j^{*}}

Stokes flow assumes that \textrm{Re} \ll 1, so the dissipation term, \frac{\partial^2 u_i^{*}}{\partial x_j^{*} \partial x_j^{*}}, will be an order of magnitude greater than the pressure term. In other words, the forces on the object in question are going to be dominated by viscosity with negligible contribution by pressure/density effects.
 
When you point out the mathematics I guess it does make sense. I don't have a lot of dynamics experience and I guess I am just having trouble intuitively getting used to the idea that the number of interactions (which is proportional to the density) would not change the viscosity.

Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
21K