Visible rotation (1 Viewer)

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

128
3
Happy new year all- Light can be rotated by a magnetic field (Faraday). Can this rotation be seen by an observer without electronic or computer methods?
 

Tide

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,078
0
If you rule out electronic means then you rule out any kind of device (even a simple polarizing filter would have to be considered electronic) since you are dealing with electromagnetic fields.
 
128
3
What if we use magnetic fields?
 

Tide

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,078
0
I'm not really sure what you are asking. Are you asking whether we can detect polarized light with the eyes? The answer in that case is "no." Can we see the effect of polarization with the eyes? In this case, the answer is "yes." Reflection of light does depends on its polarization so one could detect changes in polarization by looking for changes in reflectivity, at least for visible light. For wave like RF you have to use "electronic" means such as detection with an antenna whose orientation relative to the polarization determines the amount of signal picked up.
 
128
3
Let me refine my question: Could an observer see the effects of Faraday rotation with the un-aided eye, without the use of an electric or an electronic apparatus?
 

Tide

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,078
0
As far as I know none of the physiological components involved in vision (retina, rods, cones, cornea, lens, etc.) is sensitive to the polarization of light.
 

berkeman

Mentor
54,306
4,713
pinestone said:
Let me refine my question: Could an observer see the effects of Faraday rotation with the un-aided eye, without the use of an electric or an electronic apparatus?
As Tide points out, you can use Polaroid sunglasses or grazing reflection to tell the polarization direction of light. Would either of those fit your criteria?
 

jtbell

Mentor
15,193
2,787
Tide said:
As far as I know none of the physiological components involved in vision (retina, rods, cones, cornea, lens, etc.) is sensitive to the polarization of light.
Actually, the retina has a component that is slightly sensitive to polarization. See, for example, http://polarization.com/haidinger/haidinger.html . A Google search for "Haidinger brushes" turns up other references.
 
128
3
jtbell said:
Actually, the retina has a component that is slightly sensitive to polarization. See, for example, http://polarization.com/haidinger/haidinger.html . A Google search for "Haidinger brushes" turns up other references.
I had read this reference prior to my first post, and while most people seem to have the ability to see these images, not everyone can.
 
128
3
berkeman said:
As Tide points out, you can use Polaroid sunglasses or grazing reflection to tell the polarization direction of light. Would either of those fit your criteria?
I'm not interested in determining the polarization of light, but I do want to know if we can see the effects of Faraday rotation itself, without using computers, electromagnetic or electronic methods. Does anyone know if this has been accomplished before or if it is even possible?
 

Tide

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,078
0
128
3
...getting back to Faraday rotation, if we could cascade two Faraday rotator devices, wouldn't it be possible to obtain up to 90' of rotation?
Would four devices in a "series" configuration yield rotation angles up to 180' ?
 

zoobyshoe

Bipedal Hairy Critter
5,817
1,268
pinestone said:
Happy new year all- Light can be rotated by a magnetic field (Faraday). Can this rotation be seen by an observer without electronic or computer methods?
Faraday saw it, so I think the answer has to be yes.

The light in question must first be polarized by passing through a polarizing filter. Faraday used simple reflection off a glass surface as his polarizing filter. He used a "ray of light issuing from an Argand lamp" as his light source. I have no specific idea what an "Argand lamp" is, but I'm sure it was some kind of powerful gas lamp.

Once the light was polarized he could extinguish the ray with another polarizer at right angles to the first. He set up his electromagnet between these two filters and when it was energized he could suddenly see the image of the flame coming from the second filter. In other words, the magnetic field had rotated the polarized light so it was now oriented to pass through the second filter.

There is one more thing whose function I don't understand: he also had a piece of a particular kind of glass in between the two polarizing filters, made of "silicated borate of lead". I'm not sure what part this glass played in the phenomenon. I'm also not quite understanding how he had the magnetic field oriented with respect to the ray and the glass, but it has to be oriented in a particular way for this effect to happen.

In any event, yes, it can be seen with the naked eye.
 
128
3
Would the introduction of another stage, in-line with the first, contribute to greater degrees of rotation?
For instance, 45' exiting the first rotator, and 90' exiting the second one, and so on...What would we see? A 180' shift would almost act as a reflection, wouldn't it?
 
128
3
error corrected

pinestone said:
Would the introduction of another stage, in-line with the first, contribute to greater degrees of rotation?
For instance, 45' exiting the first rotator, and 90' exiting the second one, and so on...What would we see? A 180' shift would almost act as a reflection, wouldn't it?
...upside down?
 

Claude Bile

Science Advisor
1,471
18
The effect is readily visible if a polaroid is placed between the crystal and the observing surface. A 3 mW HeNe laser can be reduced to microwatts with the right applied magnetic field, an easily discernable difference to the naked eye.

Claude.
 
128
3
180' rotation effect? Polariod? You mean polarizer? What crystal? What kind of magnetic field is "right"? I don't understand your statement.
 

Claude Bile

Science Advisor
1,471
18
Okay, let me clarify my previous post.

Crystal = the medium that experiences the Faraday effect (Not always a crystal though, but usually).

Polaroid = A device that polarises, so yes it is a polariser.

Right magnetic field = The particular magnetic field that gives 90 degree rotation. This value will vary depending on this material one uses.

Apologies for the confusion.

Claude.
 
128
3
Is there some way of rotating the waves more than 90 degrees? If so what would we see?
 

Claude Bile

Science Advisor
1,471
18
Of course, the amount of rotation is proportional to the applied magnetic field, and the length of the magneto-optic material. As you rotate the polarisation beyond 90 degrees, the amount of power transmitted through the polaroid will begin to increase again, reaching a maximum at 180 degrees.

Claude.
 

The Physics Forums Way

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top