Undergrad Visualisation in math and physics

Click For Summary
Physicists and mathematicians often utilize a numerical-quantitative approach to problem-solving, relying less on visualization compared to chemists and biologists, who favor spatial-visual reasoning. However, certain mathematical concepts, such as geometry and calculus, benefit significantly from visual aids, enhancing understanding and retention. Textbooks in physics and mathematics frequently include diagrams and figures to support comprehension. While studies indicate a strong emphasis on numerical methods, many professionals in these fields also engage their spatial-visual skills when tackling complex problems. Overall, visualization plays a varying role in the learning and application of mathematical and physical concepts.
trees and plants
Hello. Do physicists and mathematicians visualise math formulas or specialised math or physics words?

Words like metric space, Lindelof space, metrizable space, Gamma function, harmonic function, mathematical limits, series, power series, Laurent series, phase space, symplectic space, observator, spacelike, timelike curves,vectors, Jacobi fields, spacetime, n-sphere, n-manifold, Banach space, convex function? Or formulas like the Gauss-Codazzi equation, ##m_1a_1+m_2a_2+m_3a_3=0##, ##<x,y>=x_1y_1+...+x_ny_n##, the transformation law in tensor analysis , the Riemann curvature tensor, the Christoffel symbols, the Gauss map, the shape operator?

Do they visualise them like physical objects for the symbols or images from things they know for he symbols in the formulas or the words?This also helps i think in learning, memorising and understanding. When they want to make questions or when they read scientific works do they visualise to understand?Or when they try to answer scientific questions? Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A study showed that physicists and mathematicians tended to have a very numerical-quantitative approach to problem solving, whereas chemists, biologists, etc. were more closely aligned with spatial-visual reasoning. I can't find the link right now, but it does suggest that physicists and mathematicians use less visualization than chemists and biologists. If you read a physics/maths textbook vs. a chemistry or biology textbook, this becomes very apparent.
 
On the other hand, some areas of mathematics are more easily understandable if there are some images involved. For example, geometry, trigonometry, differential and integral calculus, group theory, among others. As far as physics is concerned, just examine any textbook, and let me know if you find any with no diagrams or figures. I don't disbelieve that some study showed physicist and mathematicians had a strong numerical-quantitative approach to problem solving, but I believe that many of them also draw upon their abilities in spatial-visual reasoning.
 
  • Like
Likes SSequence
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K