Voltage required to accelerate a proton into another one

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of determining the voltage required to accelerate a proton towards another stationary proton in order to achieve fusion. The context involves concepts from electrostatics and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy in the context of proton acceleration. There are attempts to apply conservation of energy principles, with some questioning the implications of approaching zero distance between protons.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints regarding the equations used and the assumptions made about the distance between protons. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct application of formulas and the implications of charge radius on the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the use of different symbols for charge and the relevance of the distance between the centers of two touching protons. There is also mention of the need to clarify the equations used in the context of a parallel plate setup versus other scenarios.

aleksandrovich
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A proton is accelerated through a voltage ∆V with parallel plates towards another stationary proton that is "far away" outside of the proton gun. To get fusion, we want them to get close enough to touch at the surfaces. Find the voltage across the plates that would accelerate the proton enough so that it will collide with the stationary proton.


Homework Equations



U = kqQ/r^2
U = 1/2*QV
Conservation of energy; KE = 1/2 mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Letting KE at the "front" of the proton gun be 0 and U at the end be 0, the voltage will accelerate the proton to KE=U=1/2*QV (similarly, let KE=0 at the point where the protons touch). The next step is where I got stuck; since touching the other stationary proton would require r to be zero, wouldn't the proton have to overcome an infinitely large potential energy to come in contact with the other one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aleksandrovich said:

Homework Statement



A proton is accelerated through a voltage ∆V with parallel plates towards another stationary proton that is "far away" outside of the proton gun. To get fusion, we want them to get close enough to touch at the surfaces. Find the voltage across the plates that would accelerate the proton enough so that it will collide with the stationary proton.

Homework Equations



U = kqQ/r^2
U = 1/2*QV
Conservation of energy; KE = 1/2 mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Letting KE at the "front" of the proton gun be 0 and U at the end be 0, the voltage will accelerate the proton to KE=U=1/2*QV (similarly, let KE=0 at the point where the protons touch). The next step is where I got stuck; since touching the other stationary proton would require r to be zero, wouldn't the proton have to overcome an infinitely large potential energy to come in contact with the other one?

The proton has a charge radius. Look this up (google and wiki should suffice).

But your first and second equations are wrong, and the third is irrelevant. Do you know where they're wrong?

Hints:

For the first equation, look at the power of r. What are the dimensions of the quantity in that equation?

For the second: Don't confuse this parallel plate setup with the potential energy acquired by a capacitor on being charged by Q to a voltage V. That's a different scenario.

For the third: you don't have to worry about speed here.
 
Sorry, I was being very sloppy. I should have said U = kQq/r and V = U/Q => U = QV.

Thanks for the tip about the charge radius, though. Using that for r, does the rest of the problem look good?
 
aleksandrovich said:
Sorry, I was being very sloppy. I should have said U = kQq/r and V = U/Q => U = QV.

Thanks for the tip about the charge radius, though. Using that for r, does the rest of the problem look good?

Is there a need to denote two different charges with Q and q? Isn't proton charge just +e?

You haven't shown exactly how you would work the problem, but apart from the issues discussed, the conservation of energy approach is sound.

EDIT: Just noticed what you were using for r. It's also off. When you have two identical balls touching, what's the distance between their centres?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
447
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K