Volume of a solid of rotation, obtained rotating a function around x=2

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a solid of rotation by rotating the function around the line x=2. Two methods were explored: first, by inverting the function and using the integral $$V=\pi\int_{0}^{4}[4-(2-g(x))^2]\ dx$$, and second, by employing cylindrical shells. The correct volume formula using cylindrical shells is $$V = 2\pi \int_0^2 (2-x)(4-x^2) dx$$, which confirms the results from the first method. The key takeaway is the importance of correctly identifying the radius of the cylindrical shells as ##r_i = 2 - c_i##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of solids of revolution
  • Knowledge of cylindrical shell method for volume calculation
  • Ability to manipulate and evaluate definite integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of cylindrical shells in detail
  • Learn about the disk and washer methods for volume calculation
  • Explore advanced integral calculus techniques
  • Practice problems involving volumes of solids of revolution
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and professionals involved in calculus, particularly those focusing on volume calculations and geometric applications of integrals.

greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Homework Statement
Given the parabola ##y=4-x^2##, restricted to the first quadrant, compute the volume of the solid obtained by rotating the area enclosed by the parabola and xy axis around the line ##x=2##
Relevant Equations
Definite integration
At first, I inverted the function(##f^{-1}(x)=g(x)##) and calculated the volume through the integral:
$$V=\pi\int_{0}^{4}[4-(2-g(x))^2]\ dx$$
but then I questioned myself if the same result could have been obtained without inverting the function.

To find such a strategy, I proceeded as follows:
in order to get to a Riemann sum, I divided interval [a;b] into n small intervals ##dx##; for each of those I took an arbitrary point ##c_i##, and computed the volume of a single "slice" of final solid as ##V_i=f(c_i)\cdot 2\pi c_i \cdot dx##.
The total volume is thus ##V=2\pi \int_{a}^{b}xf(x) \ dx##, which applied to my case:
$$V=2\pi \int_{2}^{0}x(4-x^2) \ dx=-2\pi \int_{0}^{2}x(4-x^2) \ dx$$
but something doesn't work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first method looks okay!

As for the second, it's not obvious to me what the geometry of your slices ##V_i## are but I think you were trying to construct cylindrical shells centred on the axis of rotation ##(2, t,0)##?

That should work, but note that the radii of these cylindrical shells are actually ##r_i = 2 - c_i##, and not ##c_i##. So the area of the annulus cross-section is ##2\pi(2-c_i)dx## and hence the volume of the shell is ##V_i = 2\pi (2-c_i) f(c_i) dx##, leading to$$V = 2\pi \int_0^2 (2-x)(4-x^2) dx$$and that gives the same as your first result!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: greg_rack
etotheipi said:
The first method looks okay!

As for the second, it's not obvious to me what the geometry of your slices ##V_i## are but I think you were trying to construct cylindrical shells centred on the axis of rotation ##(2, t,0)##?

That should work, but note that the radii of these cylindrical shells are actually ##r_i = 2 - c_i##, and not ##c_i##. So the area of the annulus cross-section is ##2\pi(2-c_i)dx## and hence the volume of the shell is ##V_i = 2\pi (2-c_i) f(c_i) dx##, leading to$$V = 2\pi \int_0^2 (2-x)(4-x^2) dx$$and that gives the same as your first result!
Brilliant! I didn't notice I had to switch from ##c_i## to ##2-c_i##, and that makes perfectly sense :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K