News VP Debate: Palin Wins, Biden's Nuclear Claim Questionable

  • Thread starter Thread starter tribdog
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the recent vice presidential debate between Sarah Palin and Joe Biden, with participants expressing varied opinions on their performances. Many commentators noted that both candidates performed better than expected, with some giving the edge to Palin despite acknowledging her reliance on sound bites and avoidance of direct answers. Concerns were raised about politicians not adequately responding to questions, particularly a claim by Biden regarding Afghanistan's nuclear capabilities, which participants clarified was likely a reference to Pakistan.Biden was generally viewed as more substantive and knowledgeable, especially on foreign policy, while Palin's responses were criticized for being vague and overly simplistic. Some found her folksy style appealing, but others felt it lacked depth. The debate did not significantly shift voter opinions, with polls indicating a slight preference for Biden among uncommitted voters post-debate. Overall, while Palin managed to avoid major blunders, Biden was seen as the clear winner in terms of content and engagement with the questions posed.
  • #51
WhoWee said:
I don't think this is going to end well for ANY of us...hope I'm wrong.
How can having Obama in office be worse than Bush?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Hmmm. For McCain, 10% of 500 is 50 people. Uncertainty is ±√50 or about ±7 people or ±1.4%

Obama: 18% of 500 is 90 people.
Uncertainty = ±√90 or 9.5 people or ±1.9%

So it's a statistically significant margin for Obama. Of course, there is still the 72% who have yet to make up their minds.
 
  • #53
It was described to me earlier as the "Democratic Tsunami"...I'm not sure what that means...but it can't be good?

Too much unchecked power is never good...Democratic President, Democratic House AND Democratic Senate...who will EVER say NO?
 
  • #54
WhoWee said:
It was described to me earlier as the "Democratic Tsunami"...I'm not sure what that means...but it can't be good?

Too much unchecked power is never good...Democratic President, Democratic House AND Democratic Senate...who will EVER say NO?

What's not good is when one party gets the entire country - even the entire world - into difficult straights. They forfeit their right to have the confidence of the people and the power to set the National agenda. A wholesale house cleaning is precisely the remedy prescribed by the balance of powers when a party messes up as George Bush and the Republicans have.
 
  • #55
LowlyPion said:
What's not good is when one party gets the entire country - even the entire world - into difficult straights. They forfeit their right to have the confidence of the people and the power to set the National agenda. A wholesale house cleaning is precisely the remedy prescribed by the balance of powers when a party messes up as George Bush and the Republicans have.

Look, for the record...I NEVER LIKED BUSH...and I'm not making excuses or defending him...but we need a balance of power.
 
  • #56
WhoWee said:
Look, for the record...I NEVER LIKED BUSH...and I'm not making excuses or defending him...but we need a balance of power.
Balance of power is one thing, if both sides are honest and intend on doing the right thing. That would be the ideal. If one side is dishonest and deceitful, how is it in anyone's best interest?
 
  • #57
I'm FOR locking up the crooks and public embarrassment of liars...remember my "dunk tank" idea...hooking the candidates to a lie detector and dunking them like circus clowns every time they lie during the debates...it's starting to sound like a good idea.

Anybody 2nd the motion?
 
  • #58
WhoWee said:
I'm FOR locking up the crooks and public embarrassment of liars...remember my "dunk tank" idea...hooking the candidates to a lie detector and dunking them like circus clowns every time they lie during the debates...it's starting to sound like a good idea.

Anybody 2nd the motion?

Nah. I say just dump the Republicans all in the can.

Then pick through them and just let the honest ones come back after they have served a term in community service and reacquainted themselves with who they are supposed to be faithfully serving.
 
  • #59
You're saying that as if Democrats never lied.

Dunk tanks are fun, but they're hardly punishment for something that potentially effects millions of lives.

Unless you want to dunk them in a tank of their own blood.

Seriously, we need higher penalties for white-collar crime and crimes committed by elected officials. Murder one person brutally enough and you get to spend the rest of your life in prison, or get the death penalty. But steal from 50,000 people and you get a slap on the wrists.
 
  • #60
did anyone watch the SNL spoof of the debates? we were laughing so loud I was embarrassed.
 
  • #61
Evo said:
Balance of power is one thing, if both sides are honest and intend on doing the right thing. That would be the ideal. If one side is dishonest and deceitful, how is it in anyone's best interest?

As a casual bystander, just interested in how ideology interferes with science as elaborated upon in this thread, it occurs to me that's it's just a clash of ideologies, each with about the same level of demagoguery.

And of course the other side is always painted evil/dishonest. If you don't have an enemy, you can't fight. Be sure that the feeling is mutual.
 
  • #63
"I believe marriage is meant to be a sacred institution between two unwilling teenagers."

Priceless!
 
  • #64
"Can I call you Joe? 'Cause I got a coupla zingers where I call you Joe."
 
  • #65
Hahaha I loved the final comments by Tina Fey.. MAVERICK!, another drink! :smile:
 
  • #66
Almost like SNL is reading this thread.
 
Back
Top