Wanna ask bout dimensional analysis

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around dimensional analysis and its ability to provide numerical values for constants of proportionality in algebraic systems. Participants explore the limitations and applications of dimensional analysis in various contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions whether dimensional analysis can yield numerical values for constants, prompting responses that clarify its limitations. Some participants provide examples of dimensional analysis in calculating areas of different shapes, while others introduce a separate question about the size of matter in the Earth if all space were removed, raising concerns about atomic dimensions.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes a mix of clarifications regarding dimensional analysis and an unrelated inquiry about the size of matter in the Earth. Some participants provide insights and guidance on the latter question, while the initial question about dimensional analysis has not reached a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for new threads for unrelated questions and discuss the constraints of atomic dimensions in relation to the original topic.

pcfighter
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
any body know...
question:
true or false??
dimensional analysis can give you the numerical value of constants of propotionality that may appear in a algebra system...

and can u give the reason too...??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
False. Dimensional analysis can tell you what units you need and lead you to the general form but cannot tell you what the numerical value of constants must be.
 
An example of this would be finding the area of a plane figure by dimensional analysis. Area has units of square meters (m^2) [or square inches, or whatever length units you prefer]. So the simplest possible expression for the area is A = L^2 .

But what shape is this? As far as dimensional analysis is concerned, it doesn't matter: any plane figure will have an area given by the product of two lengths. A specific shape will have an area which includes a "dimensionless" constant related to the shape. (Also, the shape may have an area involving a product of two distinct lengths.)

So you can have

square: [tex]A = 1 \cdot x^2[/tex]

rectangle: [tex]A = 1 \cdot xy[/tex]

triangle: [tex]A = \frac{1}{2}bh[/tex]

circle: [tex]A = \pi R^2[/tex]

ellipse: [tex]A = \pi ab[/tex]

It will be much the same in dealing with any physical quantity by dimensional analysis.
 
how big would the entire matter of the Earth be if all space was removed so just matter remained??

there are approximately, 133,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms that comprise earth, but i don't know enough of atomical dimensions(how much of a proton/neutron etc are comprised of space??), to work this out.
 
azzkika said:
how big would the entire matter of the Earth be if all space was removed so just matter remained??

there are approximately, 133,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms that comprise earth, but i don't know enough of atomical dimensions(how much of a proton/neutron etc are comprised of space??), to work this out.


First off, a tip: new questions, especially if they're unrelated to the original question starting the thread, should be asked by starting a new thread.

Here's a quick way to find an estimate. You can take the mass of the Earth and divide it by the volume of the Earth (volume of a sphere with Earth's radius) to get an average density for the Earth. The typical density of nuclear matter (just protons and neutrons with "no space between" -- and the electrons hardly count...) is around 10^14 gm/(cm^3). So the volume of the "compressed Earth" would be given by

Compressed volume / Volume of Earth = average density of Earth / density of nuclear matter .

That would give you the volume of the ball of protons and neutrons. If you want to find its radius, solve the equation for the volume of this sphere for the new radius.

I haven't checked your number of atoms, but the approximate diameter of a nucleon (proton or neutron) is about 10^-15 m.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K