News Wasn't Parker Solar Probe about to resume communication with Earth?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Parker Solar Probe's status following its December 24 flyby of the Sun. A status update is expected to be transmitted back to Earth on December 28 at 05:00 UTC. Concerns were raised about the lack of information on Wikipedia, leading to speculation about potential issues. However, it was clarified that NASA's Deep Space Network has strict protocols against communicating with the probe too soon after its flyby due to the Sun's interference, which would complicate signal reception. If the status report is not received on the expected date, it may indicate poor reception rather than a malfunction. The probe is designed to retry communication if necessary. Recent updates confirm that the probe has successfully sent a check-in signal indicating it is healthy, with full data downloads anticipated soon.
mcastillo356
Gold Member
Messages
634
Reaction score
342
Hi, Physics Forums

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Solar_Probe

I haven't found any clue on Wiki, though this website is updated to two hours ago. I suppose this is not good news.

Does anybody know anything?

Love and Peace

Marcos
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"it is expected to transmit a status update back to Earth on 28 December, due to arrive at 05:00 UTC."
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes AlexB23, D H, berkeman and 1 other person
mcastillo356 said:
I haven't found any clue on Wiki, though this website is updated to two hours ago. I suppose this is not good news.
NASA's Deep Space Network has explicit rules against aiming its very expensive antennae toward the Sun. It would have been very much against the rules (these rules exist for a reason) to try any earlier than 28 December to receive status regarding the 24 December flyby. Even if the antennae were well protected, which they are not (hence the rules), there would have been so much noise from the Sun that NASA would be facing not just a low signal to noise ratio with regard to a signal from the probe but a rather high noise to signal ratio had they tried any earlier than 4 days after the fly-by.

Should the status report not be received on 28 December, I would expect that might be because reception remains a bit iffy at that point rather than a sign of bad news. If the probe did survive but did not receive an acknowledgement (ack) from Earth that the report was received, the probe will simply try again later.

Patience is a virtue in deep space missions, particularly so with the Parker Space Probe.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes DaveE, mcastillo356, BillTre and 2 others
I heard about the fake new while I was taking a shower, on Radio Nacional de España (English: Spain's National Radio) on the 25-th of December, while getting ready for christmas eve.
 
Correct. Check-in signal says everything is healthy, and full data download is expected to begin later this week.
 
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
289
Views
31K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top