News In memory: Rachel Corrie (1979 - 2003)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bilal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Memory
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the tragic death of Rachel Corrie, an American peace activist who was killed by an Israeli bulldozer while trying to prevent the demolition of a Palestinian home. Her family is seeking a more thorough investigation into her death, which occurred in 2003. Participants in the thread express a range of views on responsibility and the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Some argue that Corrie's actions were reckless and that she bears some responsibility for her death, while others emphasize her commitment to a cause and question the moral implications of the bulldozer driver's actions. The conversation also touches on broader themes of civilian casualties in conflict, the legality of settlements, and the differing perceptions of victims on both sides of the conflict. Eyewitness accounts and legal considerations are discussed, highlighting the contentious nature of the events surrounding Corrie's death and the ongoing conflict in the region.
  • #271
I can ask you exactly the same question. Is your army justified in killing school children ?

But yet, asking the same question is not answering the question. You still haven't said if you think any of this justifies Palestinians blowing up schoolchildren.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #272
well... I provided Yonoz with example of Israeli soldier murdering palestinian school girl in a cold blood (she's not the only one), and I'm waiting what he has to say and would like to see example of palestinians killing on purpose jewish kids.
There were propably instances where jewish kids died in bombings, but whoever did that was mentally sick, however israeli officer killed her in cold blood with premeditation. Until this accident i never suspected Israeli army doing things like that, soldiers are highly trained people they know rules of war or do they ??
 
  • #273
Four-apartments Building was bombed at 12 midnight, beacuse there are wanted man sleeping in ground apartment!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,762246,00.html

Israel faced searing international criticism yesterday after an airstrike which tore into a teeming neighbourhood of Gaza City, killing a Palestinian militant leader as well as nine children who were sleeping nearby.

The Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon had earlier hailed the assassination of the founder of the military wing of Hamas, Salah Shehada, as a "great success", despite the total death toll of 15.

The UN secretary general Kofi Annan urged Israel to halt such actions. "Israel has the legal and moral responsibility to take all measures to avoid the loss of innocent life; it clearly failed to do so in using a missile against an apartment building," a statement said
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #274
Again you just twist my words!

I said those settlers brought new trees (from their origin countries –mainly Europe) with them which consume a lot of water. These trees are not suitable in Middle East which suffers from water shortage …

Israel just steals the water of Syrian Golan heights (100%), South Lebanon (Wazani and Litani rivers), Jordan valley and West Bank (85%) to irrigate these trees.

There are no (real) desert in Palestine, we have dry land in the south with fertile soil , but no water resources. It is not wonderful job to steal the water of other nations and to irrigate these lands. It is appreciated if Israel uses its nuclear reactors to produce fresh water instead to plan how to annihilate ME or to prepare for Armageddon – nuclear winter.

There are a lot of desert areas in Australia, so why you did not go there and convert it to green land?



Yonoz said:
For example, what sort of serious, factuated response can I give to Bilal's claim that the native inhabitants of Palestine did not plant trees and conquer the desert because they "knew" it would be "harmful to the environment", which IMHO is a total load of crap?
 
  • #275
I got these information from your link:

((Hours later, Palestinian hospital officials said 11 Palestinians were killed and nearly 100 injured Thursday during an Israeli operation near the Jabaliya refugee camp. ))

((However, the circumstances of the reported Palestinian casualties were not immediately clear. The Israeli army said it was checking reports that Israeli forces fired a tank shell into a crowd of unarmed Palestinians))

((At the time of the Haifa bombing, bus No. 37 was carrying many high school and college students on Mount Carmel in Haifa about 2 p.m. (7 a.m. ET), Assistant Police Commander Dani Kuffler said. ))

(("We condemn all attacks against civilians, including today's attack in Haifa," he said. "The attack will only serve to distract attention from the more than 150 Palestinian civilians killed by Israel over the last two months." ))

Yonoz said:
You know, for both poor and rich people who may have nothing much or everything they could ask for, the lives of their children ARE their lives. Can you tell me how many ruined houses and destroyed orchards justify the bombing of a school bus packed with students?
I agree the destruction of houses and orchards is the wrong way to go, but I cannot ever understand those who justify the murder of innocent children with ill-treatment, no matter how much property they lost.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #276
The problem that they count only Israeli victims and ignore the barbarism of the occupation army!

http://www.btselem.org/English/Statistics/Casualties.asp

Here information about the occupation crimes from the Israeli human right center. This is the official Israeli center of human rights and it is recognized by the Israeli government and the international organization.

Palestinian human right centers show worse statistics, but I would like to present what Israeli mentioned:

Fatalities
9.29.2000-4.20.2005 Occupied Territories Israel
Palestinians killed by Israeli security forces 3168 56
Palestinians killed by Israeli civilians 35
Israeli civilians killed by Palestinians 218 438
Israeli security force personnel killed by Palestinians 219 83
Foreign citizens killed by Palestinians 10 32
Foreign citizens killed by Israeli security forces 10
Palestinians killed by Palestinians 150
**********************************************
Additional data (included in previous table)Occupied Territories Israel
Palestinian minors killed by Israeli security forces 642 1
Israeli minors killed by Palestinians 34 79
Palestinians killed during the course of an assasination 288
Palestinians who were the target of an assasination 181
Palestinians killed by Palestinians for suspected collaboration with Israel 111
***********************************************

(P.S: those Israeli civilians in Occupied Territories are ''militant settlers" , so I do not agree with the report to describe them as civilians. Additionally, most of the "Foreign citizens killed by Palestinians" are those who have dual nationality.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #277
From the previous statistics:
Israel killed 642 kids while Palestinian killed 79 kids.

Those Israeli kids who murdered in occupied land (34) are responsibility of Israeli government-their militant parents-Palestinian (who attacked them).
You can observe also that what Settlers (parent of those kids) murdered 35 Palestinian civilians.

This is documented Israeli official sources and I am sure the Palestinian human right sources double the numbers of Palestinian victims, but the truth will be somewhere between.

I said before, I am against murdering any human, and I do not believe in wars. I feel sad for victims from both sides …. But the problem, they count the Israeli victims (as American media do) and do not count the Palestinian …
This means they believe that Jews blood is superior to Palestinian blood.
 
  • #278
Bilal said:
I said before, I am against murdering any human, and I do not believe in wars. I feel sad for victims from both sides …. But the problem, they count the Israeli victims (as American media do) and do not count the Palestinian …
This means they believe that Jews blood is superior to Palestinian blood.

Hey Bilal,
American media... that is something horrendous man ! I don't watch TV anymore otherwise I would commit crime throwing my TV out of my 9th floor window and injure someone. I also stopped reading our newspapers ,newspapers here are only good for their croosword puzzles,and weather synopsis the rest is pure garbage.
And now I have just internet thank God ! however sooner or later they will get to the internet and start censoring it
 
  • #279
stoned said:
well... I provided Yonoz with example of Israeli soldier murdering palestinian school girl in a cold blood (she's not the only one), and I'm waiting what he has to say and would like to see example of palestinians killing on purpose jewish kids.
Now that I know which one of the incidents on that page you were referring to, I can answer your question. First I'll say IMO that girl's death was not justified. Now we can turn to the details of this case:
Most of the controversy in this matter was raised by the fact Iman al-Hams was shot over 20 times, not because she was initially shot. The shooter, the company's commanding officer, was put on trial for the illegal use of a weapon, obstruction of justice, conduct unbecoming an officer, and abuse of authority (the officer raised the subject after the incident in a talk with his troops). During this trial it was discovered some of the soldiers lied as part of an ongoing disobedience in the company (one of the prosecution's witnesses confessed to it in a dramatic moment during the trial). Because of his failure to control his troops and lack of leadership that officer was suspended.
Iman was shot in a clearly marked restricted zone, nowhere near her school (as a matter of fact, her school was in the opposite direction to the shooting from her house). These restricted zones surround Israeli settlements and bases so that passing-by civilian population will cannot be used as cover for attacks on them. They are marked and no one enters them. During my military service I saw some children and mentally ill adults enter these zones. On a few occassions we managed to spot someone observing them from a safe distance. In Iman's case, an observation post video shows a figure somewhere in the vicinity (some reports claim it is 50m away but you can never tell), which stays during the shooting and moves away later. In my case, we gathered it was a way of testing our defences, as we would not harm these individuals but would send a patrol to the area or fire at dead spots to get them to back away. By probing our responses in that way they could choose the best places sneak past our observations. This suspicion was confirmed by intelligence data. Sometimes these approaches would be twice or three times a day, moving in a linear pattern along the perimeter. In that particular case, the girl must have done something to make the soldiers think she was an immediate threat, such as walking directly towards them with a backpack, as they fired at her with intent to kill (IMO this is where a mistake was made). When considering the soldiers' actions, you should keep in mind the use of Palestinian children in suicide bombings and other types of violence. These http://www.operationsick.com/articles/20010515_arafatschildren.asp sometimes against the family's wishes, but sometimes http://switch3.castup.net/cunet/gm.asp?ClipMediaID=22380 .
Iman was initially shot from one of the posts, 70m away, and later from a closer range by that officer. It isn't clear which of the shootings killed her. She was carrying a backpack which she dropped after the first shot.

stoned said:
There were propably instances where jewish kids died in bombings, but whoever did that was mentally sick
I doubt it, but this violence is accepted and supported by the PA and by the Palestinian society, and there are no Palestinian movements or individuals even calling for this to change. In contrast, this event dominated Israeli discussions and media reports and editorials for weeks. I'm sure if you run a google search on the topic you'll find plenty of Israelis criticizing the IDF and persons involved this event.
stoned said:
however israeli officer killed her in cold blood with premeditation.
What makes you so certain of this? You read a short, unprofessional article on a blatant pro-Palestinian site and you think that qualifies you to make that judgement? It isn't even clear whether he killed her or the first shots from the post did. I agree it's an unnecessary death but you are taking this too far.
stoned said:
Until this accident i never suspected Israeli army doing things like that, soldiers are highly trained people they know rules of war or do they ??
This is not conventional warfare. As I showed, Palestinian terror organisations use children and teenagers to perform acts of violence. They http://www.operationsick.com/articles/20040325_pachildbomber.asp and as ways of probing Israeli defences. The IDF stopped a short practice of boobytrapping discovered ambush locations after a group of children with a handcart who were apparently sent into further prepare it activated the explosive. I have personaly seen children who had obviously no idea what they were doing try to storm a settlement with knives. In their backpacks we found rough sketches of the area and some pieces of cloth from the one of the youth-movements there. It was obvious someone else had put them up to it. In such horrible realities, telling who's a threat and who isn't is very difficult. If you were standing at the same post for several weeks and then one day a figure with a backpack started walking towards you in a restricted zone that no-one enters, you'd be singing a different song.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #280
I would like to let you know I'll be away for the next 2 days.
I'm looking forward to resuming this discussion when I return.
Keep safe, everyone.
 
  • #281
Bilal said:
Four-apartments Building was bombed at 12 midnight, beacuse there are wanted man sleeping in ground apartment!
That was indeed an unfortunate incident. The official statement attributed this unneeded loss of life to an intelligence fault, saying they thought the building was empty. Whatever the cause, that incident raised a lot of objection in Israel and a plea to the supreme court (case 8794/03) was issued by a group of emminent Israelis - including reserve pilots who made a petition announcing they would not participate in future strikes in the territories - to start an investigation into the unnecessary loss of innocent lives, and is currently in its final stages. There was even graffiti sprayed on to the cars of airforce pilots.
But have you ever looked at what http://www.embajada-israel.es/politica/Shehada1.html ? Here's a short resume:
http://www.amnesty.org.il/israel/ua_israeli.html - 30 dead, 140 wounded.
Dolphinarium bombing
The Sbarro family restaurant bombing - 15 dead, including a couple and their children aged 2, 4, and 14; two girls aged 15 and 16; a 33yo dr. and his 8yo daughter; a pregnant woman; and 18 year old waitress, and more.
http://www.hrw.org/press/2001/12/isrl1214.htm - 10 dead.
http://www.education.gov.il/children/page_39_b.htm - 5 teenagers dead.
Emmanuel bus bombing - 9 dead, including a father and his 8 months old daughter, and a premature baby delivered in the ER after the mother was seriously injured.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #282
Bilal said:
Again you just twist my words!
Really?
Bilal said:
Native people knew about your new trees centuries ago since Kanaan / Phoenicians and crusaders wars. But they knew that the ecological system and water resources in Palestine are not satisfy for these new types of trees …. So they were not enthusiastic to plant it.
What I'd like to know is how the native people in Palestine know about Eucalyptus before Sir Joseph Banks. Let's see just how bad they are for the ecological system in the ME:
In Egypt, where it is converted to particleboard, it is useful for its bank stabilisation/erosion-control properties, as well as its ability to survive while inundated by flood waters. Since the 1880s, red gums have helped to eradicate malarial swamps in Israel, reforest barren areas denuded by the firewood-hungry Ottoman Empire, and supply timber, shade and protection from marauding Arab armies. Also suitable for turnery, flooring, furniture, panelling, etc.
I hope I don't get flamed for using such a pro-Israeli site... :-p

Bilal said:
I said those settlers brought new trees (from their origin countries –mainly Europe) with them which consume a lot of water. These trees are not suitable in Middle East which suffers from water shortage …
There weren't many Australian settlers, and Eucalypts aren't native to Europe. Do you just make historical facts up? What do you base that last comment on - have you anything to back that up?

Bilal said:
Israel just steals the water of Syrian Golan heights (100%), South Lebanon (Wazani and Litani rivers), Jordan valley and West Bank (85%) to irrigate these trees.
Israel is downstream from Lebanon. How can it steal water from Lebanon if the rivers flow from Lebanon? It seems you need to read up on http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~wws401c/geography.html . A few select quotes:
Eighty percent of the basin, however, is in Israel, Jordan, and the West Bank, which do not have other significant surface water sources, and have only limited groundwater sources. Jordan relies on the surface waters of the basin for 75% of its water needs, while Israel relies on the surface waters for only 30% of its water consumption because it has larger aquifers from which to draw water. Syria relies on the basin minimally, for the Euphrates River and other smaller basins fall within its borders. Israel and Palestine have an combined 1.4 BCM/yr of renewable water resources, with an additional 450 MCM/yr captured by Israeli water reuse and rainwater collection for a total of about 2 BCM/yr. Already a deficit of water exists between what is used and what is available in the environment. In 1994, Israel and the Palestinian territories used approximately 2.1 BCM of water.
The figures for Israel and the Palestinian territories are combined, because Israel supplies the Palestinians from its national infrastructure, even in times of conflict. Israel also provides water to villages in South Lebanon and quite a substantial amount to Jordan, in excess of the amount set by the treaties between the two states.

Bilal said:
There are no (real) desert in Palestine, we have dry land in the south with fertile soil , but no water resources.
I'm assuming by "Palestine" you mean also the State of Israel, and then it depends on how you define a desert. I think it's acceptable to say it is a place with little rainfall (let's settle for under 20mm/year), which would make a very large part of Israel a genuine desert.
Bilal said:
It is not wonderful job to steal the water of other nations and to irrigate these lands.
The southern part of Israel is irrigated by water from the national carrier, originating in the Sea of Galilee, like most of Israel. The carrier was constructed in the 50's, and supplies the West Bank and Gaza as well. A lot of water is supplied from seasonal catchments that capture water that would otherwise flow to the Mediterrenean, and some of the agricultural water is supplied from treated sewerage. In Eilat, on the Red Sea, there is a desalination plant supplying water to that region.

Bilal said:
It is appreciated if Israel uses its nuclear reactors to produce fresh water instead to plan how to annihilate ME or to prepare for Armageddon – nuclear winter.
Israel uses its electricity (which is derived from coal since it's not advisable for it to develop a dependence for oil) to desalinate water from the Red Sea and there are more desalination plants being constructed. I'll ignore that last childish comment, it has no place in a serious debate.

Bilal said:
There are a lot of desert areas in Australia, so why you did not go there and convert it to green land?
Surely you're not being insensitive to the Australian Aborigines.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #283
Bilal said:
The problem that they count only Israeli victims and ignore the barbarism of the occupation army!
While I have acknowledged events such as Deir Yassin and Kefar Qana, you systematically ignore any comments on Palestinian terrorism. IMO you are the one ignoring barbarity here.

Bilal said:
Here information about the occupation crimes from the Israeli human right center. This is the official Israeli center of human rights and it is recognized by the Israeli government and the international organization.
Would you stop making things up? From the B'Tselem site:
B'Tselem is independent and is funded by contributions from foundations in Israel, Europe, and North America that support human rights activity worldwide, and by private individuals in Israel and abroad.
I'm sure it's fully recognised for tax purposes etc. but your description is quite an exaggeration. A lot of Israelis feel B'Tselem is too pro-Palestinian, and I'm sure there's a reason why the official government statistics often differ from B'Tselem. Regardless of that, can you show a Palestinian organisation of similar caliber dedicated to the abuse of Israeli rights by Palestinians?

Bilal said:
Palestinian human right centers show worse statistics, but I would like to present what Israeli mentioned:

Fatalities
9.29.2000-4.20.2005 Occupied Territories Israel
Palestinians killed by Israeli security forces 3168 56
Palestinians killed by Israeli civilians 35
Israeli civilians killed by Palestinians 218 438
Israeli security force personnel killed by Palestinians 219 83
Foreign citizens killed by Palestinians 10 32
Foreign citizens killed by Israeli security forces 10
Palestinians killed by Palestinians 150
**********************************************
Additional data (included in previous table)Occupied Territories Israel
Palestinian minors killed by Israeli security forces 642 1
Israeli minors killed by Palestinians 34 79
Palestinians killed during the course of an assasination 288
Palestinians who were the target of an assasination 181
Palestinians killed by Palestinians for suspected collaboration with Israel 111
***********************************************
What's your point? These figures don't distinguish between Palestinians involved in violence and innocent ones. Is Israel too successful in dealing with Palestinian terrorism? Would you rather see more dead Israelis?

Bilal said:
(P.S: those Israeli civilians in Occupied Territories are ''militant settlers" , so I do not agree with the report to describe them as civilians.
How would you define civilian then? What makes them "militant"?
Bilal said:
Additionally, most of the "Foreign citizens killed by Palestinians" are those who have dual nationality.)
It's funny how you can get into the small details when you want to.
 
  • #284
Bilal said:
From the previous statistics:
Israel killed 642 kids while Palestinian killed 79 kids.
You don't see too many Israeli http://www.dci-pal.org/english/Display.cfm?DocId=277&CategoryId=8 .
Bilal said:
Those Israeli kids who murdered in occupied land (34) are responsibility of Israeli government-their militant parents-Palestinian (who attacked them).
You've just justified murders of innocent children. What kind of human being are you? I think the death of 10 month old Shalhevet Pass is the responsibility of one man - Muhhamad Amro, the sniper who shot her, no matter what her parents did or where they live. It takes a very deranged mind to open fire on a father carrying a 10 month old baby with a stroller through the scope of a sniper rifle.
Bilal said:
You can observe also that what Settlers (parent of those kids) murdered 35 Palestinian civilians.
You justify the murders of their children, and now you're calling them murderers. You are not interested in peace. You are interested in perpetuating this conflict to feed your need for retribution.

Bilal said:
This is documented Israeli official sources and I am sure the Palestinian human right sources double the numbers of Palestinian victims, but the truth will be somewhere between.
This is a private Israeli source, not an official one. The official Israeli sources make the basic distinction between innocent Palestinians and those participating in violent conflict.
It's nice to know you're the authority deciding on what is true and where it is to be found.

Bilal said:
I said before, I am against murdering any human, and I do not believe in wars.
Just a few lines above you justified the murder of innocent children.
Bilal said:
I feel sad for victims from both sides …. But the problem, they count the Israeli victims (as American media do) and do not count the Palestinian …
You just proved how sad you feel for children of settlers. Stop your hypocricy.
Bilal said:
This means they believe that Jews blood is superior to Palestinian blood.
I fail to see how you rationaly arrive at that conclusion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #285
Bilal said:
This is documented Israeli official sources and I am sure the Palestinian human right sources double the numbers of Palestinian victims, but the truth will be somewhere between.

I said before, I am against murdering any human, and I do not believe in wars. I feel sad for victims from both sides …. But the problem, they count the Israeli victims (as American media do) and do not count the Palestinian …
This means they believe that Jews blood is superior to Palestinian blood.
Not only is the second part simply not true, you contradicted it before you even said it! You cannot cite an Israeli source for a Palestinian death count, then say that Israelis (or Americans) do not count Palestinian victims. :rolleyes:
 
  • #286
An interesting update:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7967481/page/2/

A longer view’
These subtle new pressures on Israel, U.S. officials say, reflect a desire in the Bush second term to begin to address some of the underlying causes of the hatred directed at the United States in the Islamic world, as well as some practical realities that grow out of the wars in Iraq and against al Qaida and the surging price of energy.
Right.
“The longer view includes making it clear that the United States wants the Palestinian people to have a state, a democratic state, and that the United States wants the Islamic world to enjoy the fruits of democracy. We think that’s the long-term way to guarantee peace because democracies just don’t tend to attack other democracies.”
Wrong.
...Ehud Barak, Israel’s former prime minister, says a new round of violence [would] exasperate a Bush administration and severely strain ties with Israel now that Washington has more pressing priorities in the Middle East since 9/11.

...after hundreds have been killed and billions of shekels lost and after an internal rift, we will no longer succeed in preserving all the large settlement blocs inside Israel. At the end of the great shortcut, we'll find ourselves withdrawing to a line that is worse than the line to which we could withdraw now. We will find ourselves on a line that is very close to the Green Line" -- a reference to the Israeli frontiers that existed before its seized the West Bank, Gaza Strip and Golan Heights in 1967.
And it would be bad to return to borders as originally established because why?
 
  • #287
Informal Logic said:
And it would be bad to return to borders as originally established because why?
Because those borders are not agreed upon.
Any major withdrawal will have to be coordinated with the PA, but Israel and the PA cannot agree on the borders at the moment.
After the Oslo accords most Israelis lost any trust they had in the Palestinians. Not only were the PA's security forces not stopping the violence, they were actually creating much violence themselves. Today, when a city is handed over to PA control, Israel hands over a list of militants. The PA is expected to collect all weapons from them or to integrate them in their security forces and thereby become directly responsible for their actions. The aim for this is to generate some trust that would enable Israel to perform larger concessions. That is the core of the current stage of the peace process.
Ehud Barak is dispised by most Israelis, from both left and right. The left holds him responsible for the miserable state of the Labour party, the right remembers his generous offers to the Palestinians just before he lost the elections. Right now he is conducting all types of media stunts to draw some attention and pave a path to running for the elections again. I would take anything he says with great doubt.
 
  • #288
Any person who takes an impartial view of the conflict can clearly see that the whole situation regarding the Palestinians as refugees is self-inflicted. Had they accepted UNGAR 181 (the UN Partition Plan) in 1947, which was a just compromise between the two parties and reasoned logically (i.e. not start the 1948 war) they would have had their own country, and (most) problems would have been solved.
 
  • #289
Let's hope that Abu Mazen proves to be more honest than his predecessor and that he will be co-operative towards a just peace negotation. I'm skeptic regarding the Road Map, and I wonder what the consequences of the withdrawal from Gaza will be.
 
  • #290
Bilal said:
Two years ago , An Israeli army bulldozer crushed Rachel Corrie as she tried to stop the demolition of a Palestinian home.

((Friday, March 18, 2005

Corrie family seeks answers at hearing

ELLYN FERGUSON

GANNETT NEWS SERVICE

WASHINGTON -- The family of Rachel Corrie continued Thursday to press for a more thorough investigation into the 2003 death of The Evergreen State College student in the Gaza Strip. ))

Website of Rachel

http://www.rachelcorrie.org/

last minutes before death of Rachel with pictures:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Corrie

Last emial of RACHEL:
((February 7 2003

Hi friends and family, and others,

I have been in Palestine for two weeks and one hour now, and I still have very few words to describe what I see. It is most difficult for me to think about what's going on here when I sit down to write back to the United States. Something about the virtual portal into luxury. I don't know if many of the children here have ever existed without tank-shell holes in their walls and the towers of an occupying army surveying them constantly from the near horizons. I think, although I'm not entirely sure, that even the smallest of these children understand that life is not like this everywhere. An eight-year-old was shot and killed by an Israeli tank two days before I got here, and many of the children murmur his name to me - Ali - or point at the posters of him on the walls. The children also love to get me to practice my limited Arabic by asking me, "Kaif Sharon?" "Kaif Bush?" and they laugh when I say, "Bush Majnoon", "Sharon Majnoon" back in my limited arabic. (How is Sharon? How is Bush? Bush is crazy. Sharon is crazy.) Of course this isn't quite what I believe, and some of the adults who have the English correct me: "Bush mish Majnoon" ... Bush is a businessman. Today I tried to learn to say, "Bush is a tool", but I don't think it translated quite right. But anyway, there are eight-year-olds here much more aware of the workings of the global power structure than I was just a few years ago. ))
You guys put it so politely, I just say: "What an idiot!"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
Replies
64
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K