B Water doesn’t fall in inverted half cup

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kashmir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air pressure Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phenomenon of water not falling from an inverted half-filled cup, as demonstrated by Brian Cox. The explanation involves the development of negative pressure inside the cup due to paper deformation, which balances the atmospheric pressure outside. The gauge pressure created by the water is approximately 0.005 atm, requiring a slight expansion of air to maintain suction. Additionally, the hydrophilic properties of the paper and glass enhance surface tension, helping to keep the paper in place. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to devise experiments to further test this explanation.
Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
I just happen to see a show about air pressure host by Brian Cox. As the link:https://i.stack.imgur.com/vfZlI.jpg shows, he flipped a half-filled water cup upside down then the paper on cup doesn't drop:
It puzzled me, because the cup is half-filled, the pressure shouldn't balance since inside water pressure+atmosphere pressure should be bigger than outside atmosphere pressure only.

What’s the explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does the film say?
The paper deformation will allow a negative pressure to develop inside the glass. The 5 cm of water in the glass will produce a gauge pressure of ~.005atm (10 m is one atm) so the air volume will need to expand by .5% to create that suction. In addition both paper and glass are hydrophyllic and the surface tension at the boundary will tend to retain the paper in place. Apparently the combination is enough.
Can you devise an experiment to test this explanation? I can think of two different ones.
 
  • Like
Likes Juanda, vanhees71 and DaveE
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top