Water entering in the container while at 30m depth

AI Thread Summary
Water entering a container at 30m depth may not create significant pressure if the container is not airtight, as water can enter and exit freely. However, if there is a slow leak and the container remains submerged for an extended period, it could become pressurized upon rapid ascent. The pressure at this depth is approximately 4atm, which is considerable and could pose safety risks during rapid depressurization. To mitigate risks, using a waterproof bag for the battery pack and ensuring that cable glands can withstand excess pressure is advisable. Overall, careful design and consideration of pressure dynamics are essential for safety.
biflora
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

It may not be the best title chosen but here is the question. If I have one container that has two compartments, one has a battery pack built from several alkaline cells and the second compartment has some pcb, wiring etc. The two compartments are separated each other with a plug, no communication port between the two. My container is supposed to be waterproof. If I drop this container in the water at 30m depth and water enters in the battery compartment, do I expect to have pressure built up in the unit when brought to the surface ? When the container is opened up, is there a safety hazard because of this possible pressure building in the unit ? There should be no chemical reaction between alkaline batteries and salt water that builds up gases ( I think). Thanks for help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally speaking, if the water can get in, the water can get out too. I don't see how you'd have a buildup of pressure in a container that isn't airtight, or even watertight for that matter. That said, it's always possible, if you had a slow leak, left the container underwater a long time, and then brought it back up quickly, the compartment would still be pressurized.

Off the top of my head, I think that's about 4atm of pressure you're dealing with, so it isn't insignificant.
 
FireStorm000 said:
Generally speaking, if the water can get in, the water can get out too. I don't see how you'd have a buildup of pressure in a container that isn't airtight, or even watertight for that matter. That said, it's always possible, if you had a slow leak, left the container underwater a long time, and then brought it back up quickly, the compartment would still be pressurized.

Off the top of my head, I think that's about 4atm of pressure you're dealing with, so it isn't insignificant.

If there's a small leak, working over a long time, then the container could end up 3/4 full of water and a rapid depressurisation could be a problem. If you make the container big enough then that need not be an embarrassment and it may be best to operate at ambient pressure, rather than at 1 Bar. You could always keep the batteries in a waterproof bag inside the container - again with a large surplus of air in it - about four times the total air volume of all the small spaces between and around the batteries, so the bag will not rupture.
You need to be you sure that the gland which takes the cables from the battery into the sealed electronics box can withstand the 3 Bar excess pressure but that shouldn't be a problem (i.e. fairly cheap). 30m is not very excessive.
It may be worth pointing out that the maximum dynamic pressure you may need to deal with may be somewhat higher than just the 3 Bar static excess (all watch manufacturers point this out when warning about the 'real' depth that their 30m 'waterproof' watches can handle).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
14K
Back
Top