Water reach (Hose without and with a nozzle)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the inside diameter of a nozzle that increases the reach of water from 1.5 meters to 24 meters using the continuity equation, specifically the equation v_{hose}A_{hose}=v_{nozzle}A_{nozzle}. The initial calculation yielded a diameter of 0.375 cm, but the correct diameter is 0.75 cm. Participants clarified the assumptions regarding the height of the water's trajectory and the angle of the hose, emphasizing that the angle does not need to be 45 degrees to solve the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the continuity equation in fluid dynamics
  • Basic knowledge of projectile motion and range equations
  • Familiarity with concepts of velocity and area in fluid flow
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations for problem-solving
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the continuity equation in fluid dynamics in detail
  • Learn about the range equation for projectile motion
  • Explore the effects of nozzle design on fluid dynamics
  • Investigate the relationship between launch angle and distance in projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying fluid dynamics, physics enthusiasts, and engineers involved in fluid mechanics or irrigation system design will benefit from this discussion.

Jenny Physics
Messages
111
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A hose of inside diameter ##1.5cm## can reach a distance of ##1.5m##. A nozzle is inserted in the hose and water can now reach ##24m##. What is the inside diameter of the nozzle? The height is the same in both cases.

Homework Equations


Use continuity equation ##v_{hose}A_{hose}=v_{nozzle}A_{nozzle}##

The Attempt at a Solution


Continuity equation gives ##1.5/t\pi r_{hose}^{2}=24\pi r_{nozzle}^{2}## which is the same as ##1.5(0.015/2)^{2}=24r_{nozzle}^{2}##. So ##r_{nozzle}=0.1875cm## and the inside diameter will be twice that or ##d=0.375cm##.

The solution however is ##d=0.75cm## (twice what I got). Where am I wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the relationship between launch speed and range?
 
haruspex said:
What is the relationship between launch speed and range?
##x=v_{horizontal}t=v_{horizonta}\sqrt{\frac{2h}{g}}##. ##h## is the same in both cases
 
Jenny Physics said:
h is the same in both cases
I see no reason why either t or h should be the same in both. What should we assume is the same?
 
haruspex said:
I see no reason why either t or h should be the same in both. What should we assume is the same?
The problem states the height is the same in both cases (with and without the nozzle)
 
Jenny Physics said:
The problem states the height is the same in both cases (with and without the nozzle)
I think they mean the heights of the end of the hose and of the point reached by the jet are the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jenny Physics
haruspex said:
I think they mean the heights of the end of the hose and of the point reached by the jet are the same.
Yes exactly
 
Jenny Physics said:
Yes exactly
But you have used it in post #3 as though the height the water reaches at the top of its trajectory is the same in both scenarios. That is not the case.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jenny Physics
haruspex said:
But you have used it in post #3 as though the height the water reaches at the top of its trajectory is the same in both scenarios. That is not the case.
I see. Still if the water exits with only horizontal velocity it can only fall down not go up. That means the point the water reaches has to be at a lower height.
 
  • #10
Jenny Physics said:
if the water exits with only horizontal velocity
It says "can reach". What does that imply about the angle of the hose?
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
It says "can reach". What does that imply about the angle of the hose?
If the angle is 90 with the horizontal obviously can't reach. So some angle between 0 and 90 degrees. I am imagining it must be 45 for some reason but I don't see what reason
 
  • #12
Jenny Physics said:
If the angle is 90 with the horizontal obviously can't reach. So some angle between 0 and 90 degrees. I am imagining it must be 45 for some reason but I don't see what reason
Look up the "range equation" for projectile motion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jenny Physics
  • #13
Jenny Physics said:
must be 45 for some reason but I don't see what reason
Because that gives the maximum range. But you do not need to assume it is 45 to solve the problem; you only have to assume that the angle does not change.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jenny Physics and gneill

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
20K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K