Water's Property: Droplets Stay Stuck in Inverted Tumbler

  • Thread starter Thread starter Milind_shyani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Property Water
AI Thread Summary
When a stainless steel tumbler is inverted after being filled with water, droplets remain stuck to the walls due to surface tension. This phenomenon is influenced by the contact angle between the water and the tumbler material; a lower contact angle allows water to cling more effectively. In contrast, if mercury were used instead of water, it would not adhere to the tumbler due to its high contact angle with steel. Understanding these principles highlights the interplay between surface tension and material properties. The discussion emphasizes that surface tension is not the sole factor; contact angle also plays a crucial role.
Milind_shyani
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Hi
When we fill a tumbler( of stainless steel) with water and then invert it ie empty it . The tumbler gets empty except a few drops of water. even if you keep the tumbler inverted for hours the water droplets do not fall down they remain stuck to the walls of the tumbler.
I hope you all reply soon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi - you didn't ask any questions there, but the effect you are talking about is surface tension...
 
russ_watters said:
Hi - you didn't ask any questions there, but the effect you are talking about is surface tension...

Hi
I know what surface tension is but is this the only reason for it
 
A little bit more. This phenomenon depends on the contact angle between water and the tumbler material as well. For example, if you test with Hg instead of water, there must be no Hg held in the tumbler any more. The contact angle of Hg against steel is too high.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top