Wave equation, general solution, cylindrical symmetry

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the general solutions to the wave equation in cylindrical coordinates, exploring the implications of cylindrical symmetry and comparing it to solutions in linear and spherical coordinates. Participants examine the mathematical formulations and potential complexities involved in finding solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a proposed solution for the wave equation in cylindrical coordinates, suggesting it might be of the form a f(r-ct)*Log(r) + b g(r+ct)*Log(r), but finds inconsistencies upon calculation.
  • Another participant provides the complete wave equation in cylindrical coordinates and notes that assuming symmetry around the z-axis simplifies it to a form resembling the spherical coordinates version, but indicates it is more complex to solve.
  • A third participant mentions that the solution involves Bessel's functions, questioning whether these functions are defined by the wave equation in cylindrical coordinates.
  • One participant clarifies that the solution discussed does not represent a general solution but rather a steady state solution, suggesting separability of the solution into radial and temporal components.
  • A later reply references a specific solution from a textbook, indicating that it is derived from integrating out the z-dependence of spherically symmetric solutions in three dimensions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of solutions in cylindrical coordinates, with some suggesting complexities and limitations in finding general solutions, while others reference established forms from literature. No consensus is reached regarding the validity of the proposed cylindrical solution or the nature of Bessel's functions in this context.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the nature of solutions in cylindrical coordinates, particularly concerning the transition from general to steady state solutions and the role of Bessel's functions.

lalbatros
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
2
I was interrested in the general solutions to the wave equation depending on only one spatial coordinate.

For one linear coordinate, the general solution is:
a f(x-ct) + b g(x+ct)​

For one radial spherical coordinate, the general solution is:
a f(r-ct)/r + b g(r+ct)/r​

I thought that for a radial cylindrical coordinate, the solution would be:
a f(r-ct)*Log(r) + b g(r+ct)*Log(r)​

Yet I found this is not a solution since I got this residual for the wave equation:
D²(f(r-ct)/r) = a (2+Log(r))*f'(r-ct)/r + b (2+Log(r))*g'(r+ct)/r​

This would indicate that the cylindrical solution applies only to the static case.

Any comment on this surprise?
Did I do a mistake in the calculations, of does that instead mean something?
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The complete wave equation in cylindrical coordinates is:

[tex]\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}=c^2\left[\frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial}{\partial \rho}\left(\rho\frac{\partial u}{\partial \rho}\right)+\frac{1}{\rho^2}\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial \theta^2}+\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial z^2}\right][/tex]

But if you want a symmetry around the z-axis, you can suppose that the function is constant for [tex]\theta[/tex] and z, so you get the equation:

[tex]\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}=\frac{c^2}{\rho}\frac{\partial}{\partial \rho}\left(\rho\frac{\partial u}{\partial \rho}\right)[/tex]

Which look like the spherical coordinates version but is much more difficult to solve. In fact, this is the wave equation in 2D polar coordinates.

The solution to this equation uses Bessel's functions, which are represented by Taylor series, not a closed form. It's strange that the solution in 2D is much more complicated that the solution in 3D.
 
(warning: my post does not really contribute anything meaningful to the discussion)
GPPaille said:
The solution to this equation uses Bessel's functions.
I was under the impression that the solution to this equation was what defined bessel functions. I could be wrong, though.
 
siyphsc: Yes, but I forgot to mention that this not gives a general solution, but only the steady state solution. So this says that the solution [tex]u(\rho,t)[/tex] is separable:

[tex]u(\rho,t)=u_s(\rho)u_t(t)[/tex]

Bessel's functions are modes in a cylindrical space for the radial component, like sinusoidal functions are modes in a 1D space.
 
In Landau and Lifgarbagez, Fluid Mechanics book, it gives as a general solution to the wave equation with cylindrical symmetry (Section 71):

\begin{equation}
\psi = \int_{ct-\rho}^{ct+\rho}\frac{F(\xi)}{\sqrt{\rho^2-(\xi-ct)^2}}
\end{equation}

The way he derives this form is by integrating out the z-dependence of the spherically symmetric solutions in 3D. Note that F is a general function that is found by satisfying the initial conditions of the wave.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K