Wave Function Collapse: Observers & Probability in Schrodinger's Cat Experiment

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter leonstavros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
leonstavros
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
In wave function collapse the observer forces one of many states to occur such as Schrödinger's cat experiment but what if you have the experiment done in a the middle of a stadium would all observers collapse the waveform the same way?

If the answer is yes then I assume that the individual observer has no part in determining the result, either the cat is dead or alive and is a matter of probability
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantum mechanics has nothing to do with human brains (apart from some obscure interpretations - sorry). Anything which interacts with the system in a significant way is an observer.
 
mfb said:
Quantum mechanics has nothing to do with human brains (apart from some obscure interpretations - sorry). Anything which interacts with the system in a significant way is an observer.

That doesn't make sense to me since everything we do we use our brain.
 
It's a matter of probability.
 
leonstavros said:
In wave function collapse the observer forces one of many states to occur such as Schrödinger's cat experiment but what if you have the experiment done in a the middle of a stadium would all observers collapse the waveform the same way?

If the answer is yes then I assume that the individual observer has no part in determining the result, either the cat is dead or alive and is a matter of probability
The answer is yes, but a microscopic "cat" may not become either dead or alive before it interacts with the "observer" or any other macroscopic object with many degrees of freedom.