Wave Function Collapse: Observers & Probability in Schrodinger's Cat Experiment

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter leonstavros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Wave function collapse in quantum mechanics dictates that an observer influences the outcome of a system, as illustrated by Schrödinger's cat experiment. The discussion posits that if the experiment occurs in a stadium filled with observers, all would collapse the waveform identically, indicating that individual observers do not affect the result. The consensus is that the cat's state—dead or alive—remains a matter of probability until interaction with a significant observer occurs. This highlights the distinction between microscopic and macroscopic observations in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave function collapse in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Schrödinger's cat thought experiment
  • Knowledge of observer effect in quantum mechanics
  • Basic principles of probability theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of wave function collapse in quantum mechanics
  • Explore different interpretations of Schrödinger's cat experiment
  • Study the observer effect and its significance in quantum theory
  • Investigate the role of probability in quantum mechanics and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and students studying the implications of observation in quantum theory will benefit from this discussion.

leonstavros
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
In wave function collapse the observer forces one of many states to occur such as Schrödinger's cat experiment but what if you have the experiment done in a the middle of a stadium would all observers collapse the waveform the same way?

If the answer is yes then I assume that the individual observer has no part in determining the result, either the cat is dead or alive and is a matter of probability
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantum mechanics has nothing to do with human brains (apart from some obscure interpretations - sorry). Anything which interacts with the system in a significant way is an observer.
 
mfb said:
Quantum mechanics has nothing to do with human brains (apart from some obscure interpretations - sorry). Anything which interacts with the system in a significant way is an observer.

That doesn't make sense to me since everything we do we use our brain.
 
It's a matter of probability.
 
leonstavros said:
In wave function collapse the observer forces one of many states to occur such as Schrödinger's cat experiment but what if you have the experiment done in a the middle of a stadium would all observers collapse the waveform the same way?

If the answer is yes then I assume that the individual observer has no part in determining the result, either the cat is dead or alive and is a matter of probability
The answer is yes, but a microscopic "cat" may not become either dead or alive before it interacts with the "observer" or any other macroscopic object with many degrees of freedom.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
11K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K