Wave Function Collapse: Observers & Probability in Schrodinger's Cat Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter leonstavros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple
leonstavros
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
In wave function collapse the observer forces one of many states to occur such as Schrodinger's cat experiment but what if you have the experiment done in a the middle of a stadium would all observers collapse the waveform the same way?

If the answer is yes then I assume that the individual observer has no part in determining the result, either the cat is dead or alive and is a matter of probability
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantum mechanics has nothing to do with human brains (apart from some obscure interpretations - sorry). Anything which interacts with the system in a significant way is an observer.
 
mfb said:
Quantum mechanics has nothing to do with human brains (apart from some obscure interpretations - sorry). Anything which interacts with the system in a significant way is an observer.

That doesn't make sense to me since everything we do we use our brain.
 
It's a matter of probability.
 
leonstavros said:
In wave function collapse the observer forces one of many states to occur such as Schrodinger's cat experiment but what if you have the experiment done in a the middle of a stadium would all observers collapse the waveform the same way?

If the answer is yes then I assume that the individual observer has no part in determining the result, either the cat is dead or alive and is a matter of probability
The answer is yes, but a microscopic "cat" may not become either dead or alive before it interacts with the "observer" or any other macroscopic object with many degrees of freedom.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top