Wave Nature of Light - Calculating Wavelength (Double Slit Exp)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the wave nature of light, specifically focusing on a double-slit experiment where monochromatic light passes through two narrow slits. The objective is to calculate the wavelength of the light based on the distance between the slits and the spacing of the interference fringes observed on a screen.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the assumptions made regarding the angle θ being small and the implications of the spacing of the fringes. There is also a focus on the formula used for calculating the wavelength and the potential errors in the original poster's approach.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the formula used and questioned the calculations made by the original poster. There is an ongoing exploration of the factors involved in the wavelength calculation, with multiple interpretations of the results being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the significance of the calculated wavelength in relation to the visibility of light, with references to the nature of ultraviolet radiation. There is uncertainty regarding the correct application of the formula and the factors involved in the calculation.

PeachBanana
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Monochromatic light falls on two very narrow slits 0.046 mm apart. Successive fringes on a screen 5.30 m away are 7.0 cm apart near the center of the pattern. Determine the wavelength of the light to two significant figures.

Homework Equations



x2 ≈ Lθ2 = L (2λ) / d

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm guessing the θ is very small so I can assume sin θ ≈ θ in radians. When the problem said the successive fringes were 7.0 cm apart near the center of the pattern, I thought that meant x2 was 7.0 cm above x1.

λ = dx2 / 2L
λ = (0.07 m)(4.6 *10^-5 m) / (2 * 5.30 m)
λ = 3.01 * 10^-7 m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there is a factor of 2 missing (or too much) somewhere. With the distance d between the slits, two adjacent fringes appear with an angle of ##\alpha \approx \frac{\lambda}{d}## between them.
In addition: With twice your calculated wavelength, the light is visible.
 
I multiplied my answer by "2" and got it correct but I am still unsure why I should have multiplied by "2." Were you stating at 3.01 * 10 ^-7 m light is not visible?
 
That corresponds to 301nm - ultraviolet radiation.

but I am still unsure why I should have multiplied by "2."
I think you divided by 2, where you shouldn't have done that.
 
It looks like you picked up a wrong formula there. Take a look at 'Young's slits' in Wikipedia.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K