Wave Status: Post Counts & Requirements

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentat
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the post count required to achieve various "wave" statuses within the forum. Currently, "Radio Wave" status is reached at 100 posts. Participants are seeking a clear breakdown of post counts corresponding to each "wave" status. There is an acknowledgment that users can customize their status, but many prefer to understand the standard progression. Overall, the conversation highlights the interest in the forum's status system and its requirements.
Mentat
Messages
3,935
Reaction score
3
"Wave" status.

How many posts does one need, to get to the different "wave" statuses?

I am at "Radio Wave" status right now (so I know that you get that when you reach 100 posts), but could someone please provide a list of post count vs. "wave" status?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I understand that I could change it, if I wanted to, to whatever I wanted (almost), but I want to know how many posts (if I just let it go normally) will equal a certain "wave" status.
 
Whats the fun in knowing?
 
Fair enough :smile:
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top