Why does the absorption of EM radiation vary with wavelength?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PrincePhoenix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Penetration Wavelength
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the wavelength of electromagnetic (EM) radiation and its penetration and absorption characteristics in various materials. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of how different wavelengths interact with matter, including atomic energy levels and material properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that for EM radiation to be absorbed, its wavelength must correspond to an energy level in an atom, leading to the idea that longer wavelengths pass through materials due to a lack of corresponding energy levels.
  • Others argue that this perspective is overly simplistic, noting that absorption can occur over a broader bandwidth due to phonons in materials, not just atomic energy levels.
  • One participant highlights that in the x-ray region, penetration increases with decreasing wavelength due to the energy dependence of photoejection cross-sections from atomic states.
  • Another participant points out that while high-energy waves tend to pass through materials largely unimpeded, absorption characteristics can vary significantly across different wavelengths and materials, such as water being transparent in the visible range but absorptive in the infrared.
  • There is a discussion about the effects of material conductivity on absorption, suggesting that if a material has constant conductivity, absorption may increase as wavelength decreases, but this is not universally applicable across all materials.
  • Participants mention additional complexities, such as the behavior of conductors at high frequencies, where radiation may penetrate due to plasma-like effects on the surface of the conductor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of absorption and penetration of EM radiation, indicating that there is no consensus on the relationship between wavelength and absorption characteristics. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific material properties, the variability of absorption across different frequency ranges, and the influence of factors like conductivity and plasma effects, which are not uniformly applicable to all materials.

PrincePhoenix
Gold Member
Messages
116
Reaction score
2
Why does penetration increase with decrease in wavelength?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PrincePhoenix said:
Why does penetration increase with decrease in wavelength?

For a wavelength of EM radiation to be absorbed it must correspond to an energy level in an atom. Consider the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_atom#Energy_levels".

At longer wavelengths, there is no corresponding energy level for the EM radiation, thus the wave passes through the body.

There is a nice chart from www.hyperphysics.com

em_and_the_body.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Salwa Asem and Simon Clement
PrincePhoenix said:
Why does penetration increase with decrease in wavelength?
I presume you mean photons? In the x-ray region, x-ray penetration increases with decreasing wavelength due to the energy dependence of the deep-core photoejection cross-section of electrons from deeply bound atomic states, e.g., k-shell.

cross section =~ Const x Z4/(hν)3

The minimum cross section is very roughly between 1 and 2 MeV.

Bob S
 
Last edited:
adamwho said:
For a wavelength of EM radiation to be absorbed it must correspond to an energy level in an atom. Consider the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_atom#Energy_levels".

At longer wavelengths, there is no corresponding energy level for the EM radiation, thus the wave passes through the body.

This is not strictly correct. If the absorption of radiation was strictly due to atomic energy levels then the absorption would occur only at very narrow bandwidths, which is contrary to common experience (like the black body radiator for example or microwave heating). The phonons in a material will absorb radiation over a larger bandwidth than the atoms alone.

As Bob S stated, the penetration of high energy waves actually increases with shortening of wavelength. The absorption properties of a material will greatly vary over the frequency range. In general, I would only say that high energy waves will pass through most objects largely unimpeded. Below x-rays, the absorption becomes widely varying and material dependent. For example, water is transparent in the visible light region (for most purposes let's say) but it is much more highly absorptive in the infrared and microwave region. So for water, over a given bandwidth, the absorption decreases as the wavelength decreases.

However, let's say we have a material that has a constant conductivity over a given bandwidth. In this case, the absorption of the radiation will increase as the wavelength decreases. This is because the radiation's loss in the material is exponentially dependent on the penetration depth in terms of wavelengths. So, keeping the material's depth the same, the electromagnetic wave will see a depth of increasing number of wavelengths as its own wavelength decreases. So we would expect the attenuation to increase with frequency.

But again, most materials do not have a consistent effective conductivity across the spectrum. And so we can only characterize small regions of the spectrum in this manner. There is also other effects that can cause deviations, like the eruption of plasmas in metals. A good conductor will not allow radiation to pass through, but at a high enough frequency, the surface of the conductor looks similar to a plasma, and the electrons will not be able to oscillate fast enough to cancel out the incident waves. And thus, the radiation can pass through.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K