Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Wavelength as a yardstick

  1. Jun 25, 2010 #1
    Could electromagnetic wavelength be used as a legitimate distance pattern? I mean is it OK to exchange geometrical length with physical wavelength? For example, given a bundle of light rays following geodesics in empty space, can the length between a given pair of geodesics be equivalent to a wavelength?
    I recall vaguely that the General Conference on Weights and Measures in 1983 adopted as a primary length standard, or reference length, the wavelength of the iodine stabilized HeNe laser,He−Ne = 632.99139822 nm.Thus, in physical metrology seems to be a common practice to use an appropriate wavelength of electromagnetic radiation as the reference length. But I don't know if it is physically straightforward to interchange geometrical lengths with wavelengths as in switching in a given Physics formula the wavelength with an equivalent geometrical length.

    Thanks
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 25, 2010 #2

    rcgldr

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    There are devices that count wavelength cycles to determine distance (moved) for very precise measurements.
     
  4. Jun 27, 2010 #3
    I understand wavelengths are interchangeable with lengths in every physical situation.
    Anyone thinks otherwise?
     
  5. Jun 27, 2010 #4

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Lengths are lengths. If doesn't matter what the length measures.
     
  6. Jun 27, 2010 #5

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    It's not clear what you are asking; electromagnetic radiation is used as a *time* standard, not a length standard (frequency vs. wavelength). However, because 'c_0' is a constant, it's possible to think of the meter being standardized in terms of a wavelength as well- as long as you mean wavelength in vacuum, or otherwise correct for the index of refraction.

    That said, 'length' is 'length'... I don't understand what you mean by 'geometric' length vs. 'physical' length. Certainly, it's possible to scale physical parameters in an equation to obtain nondimensional groups (scaling the navier-stokes equation to obtain the Reynolds number, for example).
     
  7. Jul 2, 2010 #6
    I Googled 'geometrical length' to try and find out what the OP is talking about.

    I came up with this thread as the only reference. :rofl:
     
  8. Jul 2, 2010 #7
    The speed of light is 'by definition' 299,792,458 metres per second. So yes, a wavelength is as good a distance measure as nature offers.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Wavelength as a yardstick
  1. The Wavelength of Earth (Replies: 20)

  2. Wavelength of Light (Replies: 5)

Loading...