Wavepacket Problem: Writing |psi(x,t)|^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter trash057
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavepacket
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The wavepacket problem involves expressing |psi(x,t)|^2 as a linear combination of two eigenstates, phi0(x) and phi1(x). The expression is derived from the equation psi = a_0 psi_0 + a_1 psi_1, leading to the integral |psi|^2 = |a_0 psi_0|^2 + |a_1 psi_1|^2 + a_0a^{*}_1psi_0psi^{*}_1 + a_1a^{*}_0psi_1psi^{*}_0. The normalization condition requires that the integral of |psi|^2 over all space equals 1, confirming the necessity of expanding the right-hand side (RHS) to derive the complete expression. The constants a_0 and a_1 are assumed to be real for simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, specifically wavefunctions and eigenstates.
  • Familiarity with normalization conditions in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their properties in mathematical expressions.
  • Proficiency in performing integrals over functions in three-dimensional space.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of quantum superposition and linear combinations of eigenstates.
  • Learn about normalization of wavefunctions in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the mathematical techniques for expanding integrals involving complex functions.
  • Investigate the implications of the Boltzmann constant and Planck's constant in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists working on wavepacket analysis, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum states.

trash057
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A wavepacket, psi(x,t), can be expressed as a linear combination of eigenstates. Assuming that only 2 eigenstates, phi0(x) and phi1(x), contribute to the linear combination write down the expression for |psi(x,t)|^2.

Homework Equations



[Boltzmann's constant = 1.38 x10^23 J /K, Planck's constant h = 6.626 x10 ^-34 J s,
Gas constant R = 8.314 J K /mol]

The Attempt at a Solution



I need help with how to start solving this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is just an educated guess, but I'd say something like:
\psi = a_0 \psi_0 + a_1 \psi_1
So:
\int \psi \psi^{*} d^3r = \int (a_0 \psi_0 + a_1 \psi_1)(a^{*}_0 \psi^{*}_0 + a^{*}_1 \psi^{*}_1) d^3r
Now all you need to do is expand the RHS and see what you get (the integral is over all space, so what does that tell you about what the integral must equal?). If I were you I would also assume that the orginal wavefunctions (psi0 and psi1) are normalised, and that the constants a0 and a1 have no imaginary component.

That's what I would do for this question anyway, but I'm definitely no expert on the subject. lol.
 
ppyadof said:
This is just an educated guess, but I'd say something like:
\psi = a_0 \psi_0 + a_1 \psi_1
So:
\int \psi \psi^{*} d^3r = \int (a_0 \psi_0 + a_1 \psi_1)(a^{*}_0 \psi^{*}_0 + a^{*}_1 \psi^{*}_1) d^3r
Now all you need to do is expand the RHS and see what you get (the integral is over all space, so what does that tell you about what the integral must equal?).

The integral must equal 1. But do I need to expand the RHS? It just says to write the expression not to evaluate the expression.
 
trash057 said:
The integral must equal 1. But do I need to expand the RHS? It just says to write the expression not to evaluate the expression.

oh yeah, my bad.
 
Hey, no problem. Thanks for your help. I'm not sure how to expand this. I can handle numbers but when symbols are used, I start to have trouble. I'm guessing there will be four results, two zeroes and two ones. The ones being psi1 x psi1*, and psi0 x psi0*, but I'm not sure how to expand this and get those results.
 
Unless I made a mistake, you should end up with something like:
|\psi|^2 = |a_0 \psi_0|^2 + |a_1 \psi_1|^2 + a_0a^{*}_1\psi_0\psi^{*}_1 + a_1a^{*}_0\psi_1\psi^{*}_0

Obviously the normalisation constants of the first two terms of that expression are going to be real. You can prove that by writing the normalisation constants as a complex exponential a_0 = r_0e^{i\theta_0}. If you do that with a1 aswell, then you could simplify the other terms involving a1*a0 and a0*a1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K