(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

I'm reading the proof of a theorem and the author claims w/o justification that a weakly lower semi-continuous function (w.l.s.c.) f:C-->R attains its min on the convex weakly compact subset C of a normed space E.

At first I though I saw why: Let a be the inf of f on C and x_n be a sequence in C such that f(x_n) --> a. Since C is weakly compact,we can find a weakly convergent subsequencex_n_k-->x, and because f is w.l.s.c., we will have f(x)<=a, thus f(x)=a.

But what reason do we have to believe that C isweakly sequentially compact, so that the bold part above is justified??

(By "weakly" I mean "under the weak topology [tex]\sigma(C,C^*)[/tex]".)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Weakly l.s.c. function attains its min on weakly compact set?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**