- 15,536
- 1,917
gracy said:mgh=1/2 MV^2+1/2 m[(v cos theta - V)^2 +(v sin theta)^2]
is it correct now?
Yes, it is correct.
gracy said:mgh=1/2 MV^2+1/2 m[(v cos theta - V)^2 +(v sin theta)^2]
is it correct now?
No.Sorry.Thankfully Typo.The formula is fo V.I forgot to press caps lock.ehild said:Is the formula in Post#3 really for v?
Yes.AlephNumbers said:The surface that the wedge is on is frictionless, yes
Along which axis?AlephNumbers said:The linear momentum has to be equal to zero, right?
gracy said:Solving for these two I got an answer
I didn't understand.AlephNumbers said:collided with a frictionless surface
And what about answer.Is it right or wrong?AlephNumbers said:You have the right equations
gracy said:My doubt is that now block is not on wedge,so force which was responsible for motion of block is no longer there.So block should have constant velocity that is same as it's velocity when the block was at bottom most part because after that force was removed (as block came off from wedge)
Yes you are right. But is you want the conservation of momentum to be applied in non inertial frame, you need to add in fictitious forces into your free body diagram.gracy said:Is conservation of momentum applied in non inertial frame?As conservation of momentum is derived from Newton's second law and Newton's second law is only applicable in inertial frames ,conservation of momentum should only be applied in inertial frames,right?
Hmmm...correction needed.gracy said:And conservation of energy
1/2 mv^2=mgh(maximum height)+1/2mV^2+1/2MV^2
I think this is wrong. The use of conservation of momentum should be in the same direction. So it should be mucosθ=(M+m)Vgracy said:So mu=(m+M)V
gracy said:mu=(m+M)V
From these equations I solved for h(maximum height upto which block rises on wedge .gracy said:1/2 mu^2=mgh(maximum height)+1/2mV^2+1/2MV^2
No.It is correct.Yoonique said:I think this is wrong. The use of conservation of momentum should be in the same direction. So it should be mucosθ=(M+m)V