Wedge product and change of variables

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical proof of the relationship between the wedge product of differential forms and the determinant of the Jacobian matrix during a change of variables, specifically expressed as dy1∧...∧dyn = (det Dφ(x))·dx1∧...∧dxn. Michael Albanese's response provides a link to a detailed explanation, emphasizing the necessity of understanding the pullback of differential forms and the concept of multilinear maps. The conversation highlights the importance of avoiding overly complex methods while still grasping essential definitions and principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • C1 maps in differential geometry
  • Wedge products in exterior algebra
  • Determinants of Jacobian matrices
  • Pullback of differential forms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of C1 maps in the context of differential geometry
  • Learn about the pullback operation on differential forms
  • Explore the concept of multilinear maps and their applications
  • Investigate the relationship between wedge products and determinants in higher dimensions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of differential geometry, and anyone interested in understanding the applications of wedge products and change of variables in calculus and linear algebra.

ianchenmu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The question is: Let [itex]\phi: \mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^n[/itex] be a [itex]C^1[/itex] map and let [itex]y=\phi(x)[/itex] be the change of variables. Show that d[itex]y_1\wedge...\wedge[/itex]d[itex]y_n[/itex]=(detD[itex]\phi(x)[/itex])[itex]\cdot[/itex]d[itex]x_1\wedge...\wedge[/itex]d[itex]x_n[/itex].

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution


Take a look at here and the answer given by Michael Albanese:
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/367949/wedge-product-and-change-of-variables

My question is can we prove it without using the fact "[itex]\det A = \sum_{\sigma\in S_n}\operatorname{sign}(\sigma)\prod_{i=1}^na_{i \sigma(j)}[/itex]"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the definition of the pullback of a differential form ? This is a generalization to multilinear

maps of the "induced map" L* , from W* to V*, given a linear map L:V-->W , both V,W vector spaces.

I'm trying to avoid heavy machinery, but I think you need to understand this, unless you just want

a quick-and-dirty answer ( I assume you don't since you would have accepted the answer from the link

if you did.). You are basically doing a change of bases for multilinear maps, an extension of the idea of

basis change for a linear map.
 
Last edited:
Or maybe you can tell us the approach you want to follow .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K