Weighing a Man on the Equator: Solving the Puzzle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the weight of a man on the equator, specifically addressing the effects of centrifugal force due to Earth's rotation. The original poster presents a scenario where a man weighs 780 N and questions the weight measured by a scale (referred to as "libra") under these conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between gravitational force and centrifugal force, questioning the interpretation of the term "libra" and its implications for weight measurement. There is discussion about the relevance of calculating mass and the potential for misinterpretation of the problem statement.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants clarifying the problem's context and exploring different interpretations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between gravitational and centrifugal forces, but no consensus has been reached on the correct interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original problem may lack clarity, particularly regarding the rotational speed of the Earth and its impact on weight measurement. There is also mention of potential misprints in the source material.

Kernul
Messages
211
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


A man that has an ordinarily weight of 780 N stands on a libra on the equator.

Homework Equations


What is the weight measured by the libra?

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought it was simple, so I just did:
P = m * g
Since it gives me P I can simply do:
m = P / g = 780 / 9.81 = 79.51 kg
But looking at the solution on the book it says that it's 0.
Did I do something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To me it seems you do the right thing. A libra compares two masses and ordinarily we use 9.81 as gravitational acceleration.
Could the book be off ? Misprint or something ?

Otherwise it's a corny interpretation of "weight measured by the libra" ... after all it doesn't literally measure weight
 
A "Libra" is a "scale"? Where does he "ordinarily weigh 780 N"? If he "ordinarily" weighs himself on the equator, then his weight on the equator would, of course, be 780 N! You calculate the person's mass but I don't see how that is relevant to the question. You say the books answer is "0" (are there no units) so perhaps I am misunderstanding "libra".

A person's true 'weight', the force the Earth exerts on a person, is 9.81 (approximately) times the mass of the person. What the person weighs is that force minus the mass of the person times the centripetal force on the person due to the rotation of the earth. That will be 0 at the poles and maximum at the equator.
 
With "libra" I mean the object. Like the sign.
Where? Wherever on the Earth but the equator, it seems.
Now that I think about it actually calculating the mass doesn't bring me anywhere...
It is 0 on the book. Without anything after.
Anyway this was the third question the the entire problem I didn't thought you could have needed everything since I thought every question was just by itself.
Anyway, in a previous question on the book I calculated the angular velocity so, doing the calculations in the second thing you said we have the centripetal force:
Fcentripetal = m * ω2 * RT
The ω I calculated was because the question before asked what was the ω if the centripetal force was the same as the gravitational force at the equator on the same mass.
So we have:
P - Fcentripetal = 780 - [79.5 * (1.24 * 10-3)2 * 6.371 * 106] = 2
It's not 0 but it is near I think.
 
Confusing. What is the complete question + context ?
Seems to me your original post forgot to mention the Earth isn't rotating with the same angular speed that we are used to "ordinarily" :rolleyes:
 
Yeah, you are right. Let me write everything.
"What's the value of the angular velocity of rotation of the Earth so that the centrifugal force at the equator is the same as the gravitational force on the mass on the same spot?
If the Earth turn at this speed, how long would it be a day? If a man that weighs ordinarily 780 N would stand on foot on a libra situated on the equator, what would the weight measured by the libra be?"
I'm sorry if something doesn't seem clear but I'm translating the exercise from my language to English language.
 
That's somewhat different than what I gathered from post #1 :smile:

If centrifugal force cancels gravitation, a scale (a force measurement, with a spring or something) would show 0 since there is no force left over.
A libra (I interpret that as: a balance) wouldn't work either: nothing is pulling the scales down, so any two masses can be glued to the scales and seem to be "in balance".

On such a fast-rotating planet, wouldn't it be risky to jump ? :rolleyes:
 
Hahahahaha! Now I got it!
Okay, okay. Next times I'll write always the full the exercise.
Sorry for not being clear from the beginning!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K