Weight at the North Pole vs. Equator Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the weight of a person at the equator compared to the North Pole, given that the person weighs 600N at the North Pole. Using the formula N = mg - mrω², where N is the normal force, m is mass, g is gravitational acceleration, r is the Earth's radius, and ω is the angular velocity, the calculated weight at the equator is approximately 602.06N. The confusion arose from the direction of centripetal acceleration and its impact on weight perception at different latitudes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational force and weight calculations
  • Familiarity with centripetal acceleration concepts
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and its application in physics
  • Ability to interpret Free Body Diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of centripetal acceleration on weight perception
  • Learn about gravitational variations at different latitudes
  • Explore the implications of Earth's rotation on weight measurements
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of weight changes due to rotation
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching gravitational concepts, and anyone interested in the effects of Earth's rotation on weight measurements.

Legaldose
Messages
73
Reaction score
6
1. Suppose Earth is a perfect sphere of radius 6,370km. If a person weighs exactly 600N at the north pole, how much will the person weigh at the equator?

Givens:

r = 6,370km = 6,370,000m
Weight at north pole = mg = 600N

Homework Equations



ω[itex]_{av}[/itex] = θ/t

ƩF[itex]_{net}[/itex] = ma

a[itex]_{c}[/itex] = v[itex]^{2}[/itex]/r


The Attempt at a Solution




Okay, so the first thing I did was to draw a picture. Then I noticed that ω[itex]_{av}[/itex] would be 0 at the North Pole because you don't have any rotational velocity! Then I set up a Free Body Diagram for a location at the equator and see that the normal force (N) is acting up perpendicular to the ground, and gravity is acting downward towards the center of the Earths gravity.

I get

ƩF[itex]_{y}[/itex] = ma[itex]_{y}[/itex]

where a[itex]_{y}[/itex] is the centripetal acceleration a[itex]_{c}[/itex]

so

ƩF[itex]_{y}[/itex] = mv[itex]^{2}[/itex]/r = mrω[itex]^{2}[/itex]

and substituting in N and mg for ƩF[itex]_{y}[/itex]

N-mg = mrω[itex]^{2}[/itex]

since we are looking for N

N = mrω[itex]^{2}[/itex]+mg

and so when I substitute the values of m, r, ω, and g I get

N = 61.16kg(6.37 x 10[itex]^{6}[/itex]m)(7.27 x 10[itex]^{-5}[/itex]rad/s)[itex]^{2}[/itex] + 61.16kg(9.81m/s[itex]^{2}[/itex])

solving for N I get 602.06N

But I thought that you weighed less at the equator? I believe I missed something fundamental, can someone please help me out here? Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It should be mg-N=mrω^2, since the centripetal acceleration points inwards towards the center, and so does mg, but not N.
 
It should be mg-N=mrω^2, since the centripetal acceleration points inwards towards the center, and so does mg, but not N.

Oh! So at that point I should take downward as positive and solve for N = mg-mrω^2? That makes more sense I don't know why I didn't remember that the centripetal acceleration would be pointed towards the center of gravity as well, thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
41
Views
4K