Weight Distribution Across Multiple Points

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the reaction forces at multiple support points for a large frame carrying an unevenly distributed weight. Participants explore theoretical approaches, mathematical formulations, and practical considerations related to the problem, including the effects of ground surface and frame flexibility.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the basic equations for calculating reaction forces at two supports and seeks to extend this to multiple supports.
  • Another participant provides a generalized equation for multiple weights, suggesting that the sum of the weights multiplied by their distances from the center of gravity equals zero.
  • A third participant introduces considerations for uneven ground and the effects of frame rigidity, proposing two extreme cases: a perfectly rigid frame and a perfectly flexible frame, noting that real-world scenarios will be a combination of both.
  • Further contributions reiterate the generalized equations and request a worked example using specific numerical values to clarify the application of the theory.
  • One participant discusses the implications of statically indeterminate systems and the need to analyze local forces on both the load and the supports.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding and application of the equations, with some seeking clarification and examples. There is no clear consensus on the best approach to solve the problem, and multiple competing views on the effects of frame flexibility and ground conditions are present.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the complexity of the problem, including the need to account for frame stiffness and the influence of road conditions, which complicates the calculations. The discussion also highlights the challenge of applying theoretical models to practical scenarios.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in structural engineering, mechanics, and those dealing with load distribution problems in practical applications.

IanPibworth
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
How to calculate reaction forces at multiple points.
Thanks in advance to anyone that can help me solve this problem, its causing me a real headache.

I need to transport a rather large frame that supports a large heavy item. The weight is not evenly distributed along its length. I know the various distances between the supports, the total weight and the center of mass.

I know how to calculate a simple 2 support situation.
Where Wr is weight at rear, Cg is distance from front support to Center of mass and D is distance between the 2 supports. Wf is weight at front.

Wr = (WxCg)/D
Wf = W-Wr

BUT... how do I go about calculating the reaction force (weight on each point) for the problem outlined below??

1568486811983.png

distances
 

Attachments

  • 1568486743757.png
    1568486743757.png
    8.1 KB · Views: 634
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello.
IanPibworth said:
Summary: How to calculate reaction forces at multiple points.

Where Wr is weight at rear, Cg is distance from front support to Center of mass and D is distance between the 2 supports. Wf is weight at front.

Wr = (WxCg)/D
Wf = W-Wr

The first equation is rewritten with help of the second,
W_r(C_g-D)+W_fC_g=0

We can interpret this that summation of weight multiplied by distance from center of gravity, with plus or minus signature according to right or left position of support, is zero.

We can generalize this to multiple weight case, i.e.

\sum_i W_i d_i=0
\sum_i W_i =W

where ##W_i## is i-th weight an ##d_i## is its plus or minus distance from Center of Gravity.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: IanPibworth
You need to consider the effect of uneven ground/road surface. Start by imagining two cases:
Case 1: Perfectly rigid frame. In that case, the entire load will be supported at exactly two points (ignoring the effect of width at this time. Those two points will change as the road surface changes. Think of cresting a hill vs centered on a valley.

Case 2: A perfectly flexible frame. In that case, the frame will flex with the road, and the load distribution will not change as the road surface changes.

Neither of those cases is a real world case. The real world case is a frame that flexes somewhat, and the local loads increase at the high points of the road and decrease at the low points of the road. This also is the case in the transverse direction where the road can twist the frame. An extreme example is shown below:
Twisted.jpg


I assume the frame is supported by a spring suspension and pneumatic tires. The total stiffness of the frame, spring, and tire assembly is calculated. Then look at the absolute worst case road it will travel over, and calculate the load at each wheel. All this assumes that the load is supported on the frame such that the frame can flex and twist without exerting forces on the load. If the load is some sort of structure tied to the frame at multiple points, then the stiffness of the load must be added to the stiffness of the frame, suspension, and tires. The last step in the calculation is to calculation the forces on the load, and compare to allowable forces on the load. This problem is statically indeterminate, and is analyzed using the methods for statically indeterminate systems.

You need to check the forces of each wheel against the road to make sure you don't break off a wheel, and the local forces on the load to make sure you don't damage the load. There is a section in your Mechanics of Materials book about statically indeterminate system. You will need to spend some time studying that material.
You did keep your textbook, didn't you? If not, buy another copy because you will be using it in the future.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
mitochan said:
Hello.The first equation is rewritten with help of the second,
W_r(C_g-D)+W_fC_g=0

We can interpret this that summation of weight multiplied by distance from center of gravity, with plus or minus signature according to right or left position of support, is zero.

We can generalize this to multiple weight case, i.e.

\sum_i W_i d_i=0
\sum_i W_i =W

where ##W_i## is i-th weight an ##d_i## is its plus or minus distance from Center of Gravity.

I think I understand the logic but struggling to put it into practice. Could you please solve an example using the following numbers so I can fully understand?

All distances are from load point to CoG. + is to the right of CoG and - is to the left of CoG.

W = 10,000Kg

Point A - D1 = 2m Point D D6 = -0.5m
Point B -D2 = 3m Point E D7 = -1.5m
Point C -D3 = 6m Point F D8 = -3m
 
Hello. For your case
2W_1+3W_2+6W_3-0.5W_6-1.5W_7-3W_8=0
W_1+W_2+W_3+W_6+W_7+W_8=10000
This formula gives any two of Ws when other four Ws are given properly.

To explain this arbitrariness let us see a simpler case of homogeneous beam supported by center and both the ends. The equations are
W_1-W_3=0
W_1+W_2+W_3=W

solution is
W_1=W_3=aW
W_2=(1-2a)W
where a is parameter we can design within 0<a<1/2.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: IanPibworth
Thank-you for your help mitochan
 
mitochan said:
Hello. For your case
2W_1+3W_2+6W_3-0.5W_6-1.5W_7-3W_8=0
W_1+W_2+W_3+W_6+W_7+W_8=10000
This formula gives any two of Ws when other four Ws are given properly.

To explain this arbitrariness let us see a simpler case of homogeneous beam supported by center and both the ends. The equations are
W_1-W_3=0
W_1+W_2+W_3=W

solution is
W_1=W_3=aW
W_2=(1-2a)W
where a is parameter we can design within 0<a<1/2.
Hello, Could you please provide a detailed calculation on the multiple points ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K