Weighted Average Velocity between r1 and r2

  • Thread starter Thread starter natski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Average
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of weighted average velocity for a body moving between two positions, r1 and r2, where the velocity is a function of position and does not vary linearly with time. Participants are exploring the appropriate formulation for calculating average velocity in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the validity of using integrals over position versus time to calculate average velocity. There is a discussion about whether the original formula proposed by the original poster is sufficient and if there are special cases to consider.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different formulations for average velocity, with some participants suggesting that integrating over position can yield valid results. Others are questioning the assumptions behind these approaches and clarifying the equivalence of certain integrals.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of defining time as a function of position and the conditions under which the proposed formulas may or may not hold true. There is a reference to a disagreement regarding the method of integration and its impact on the calculation of average velocity.

natski
Messages
262
Reaction score
2
Consider a velocity which is a function of position r, which does not vary linearly with time.

Consider a body moving with this varying velocity between distance r1 to r2.

Let us define the average velocity between r1 and r2 as (r2-r1)/time taken to travel between r2 and r1.

I assumed the average would be found by:

Integral[ v(r) dr {r2, r1}] / Integral [dr {r2, r1}]

But this formula does not seem to work. Are there any special cases where this formula is not sufficient?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need the integral over time to get the average velocity.
 
But time is a function of position, so there does not seem any reason why one could not use the position as an equivalent weight?

So you suggest:

Integral[v dt] / Integral[dt]

But
r(t) => dr/dt = 1/f'
=> dt = f' dr

Hence one could write Integral[v f' dr] / Integral[f' dr]

But dr/dt = v
hence f' = 1/v
=> vbar = Integral[dr] / Integral[dr /v]
 
Last edited:
natski said:
So you suggest:

Integral[v dt] / Integral[dt] ...(1)

...

But dr/dt = v
hence f' = 1/v
=> vbar = Integral[dr] / Integral[dr /v] ...(2)

The two integrals (1) and (2) are identical. Sorry, I don't get your point now...?
 
Well Meir felt you couldn't take the weighted average by integrating over position, but I am trying to prove that you can by virtue of the fact that his suggestion, of integrating over time, can be written as an integral over position.
 
natski said:
Well Meir felt you couldn't take the weighted average by integrating over position, but I am trying to prove that you can by virtue of the fact that his suggestion, of integrating over time, can be written as an integral over position.

Ok. But Meir was responding to this in your original post:

"Integral[ v(r) dr {r2, r1}] / Integral [dr {r2, r1}]"

which is not going to give average velocity.

But "vbar = Integral[dr] / Integral[dr /v]" in your 3rd post will give average velocity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K