Change in Potential Energy levels of a body in Gravitational field.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the change in potential energy levels of a body in a gravitational field, specifically examining the work done by gravitational forces during upward and downward motion. The original poster presents a calculation involving the work done when lifting a mass from the Earth's surface to a height and questions the sign of the potential energy change when the body falls back down.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the work done in lifting a body and questions the apparent contradiction in the sign of potential energy change when falling. Some participants clarify the sign conventions for work done by gravity during ascent and descent, while others explore the implications of integration limits on the results.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the concepts of work and potential energy, with some providing insights into the integration process and the role of direction in determining the sign of work done. There is a recognition of the importance of understanding the relationship between force, displacement, and the resulting work done.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing exploration of the conventions used in physics regarding potential energy and work, particularly in the context of gravitational forces. The original poster expresses confusion about the signs of potential energy changes and the assumptions underlying their calculations.

harjyot
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Now , I Will Begin by stating the calculation and i will post the query at the end.

so here we begin,
we know that If W is the work done by a conservative force,
potential energy change is given by:
ΔW= - ΔU ...(1)
ie when work done by conservative force is positive , Potential energy decreases ..right?

now I am going to derive the work done in lifting a body up from say Earth's surface (r1) to some height(r2) let small body be of mass 'm' and the Huge body (earth ,say) be 'M".

now F(conservative force) ,points downwards ,and the displacement is upwards
so, dw = -Fdr
integrating over the limit , r1 to r2,(Using Newtons Law F = GMm/r^2)
...r2........r2
∫dw = -∫fdr → w = - GmMv ∫(1/r^2)dr → w= GmM(1/r2 - 1/r1)
...r1........ r1

now since r2>r1 (Its Going up) , W is Negative , and Hence by (1) Potential Energy Change is Positive (Which is true),
but Suppose we consider a case where a body 'Falls' from r1 to r2

now here F(gravitational force) and dr(displacement) both Point along the same direction.


so , dw = fdr

...r2 ....... r2
∫dw = ∫fdr → w= GMm(-1/r) → w= GMm(1/r1-1/r2)
...r1......r1


Now Since r1>r2,
w is coming negative
and then by ...(1) ΔU is coming Positive ... I mean How is THis ? THe Change in Potential energy levels should be negative.

Now i do know that potential energy at any point is by convention considered negative , but this here is the 'change' and it should come negative too , but it doesn't ... i don't know why this is happening ? can anyone explain ,where i am going wrong ?

if i just solve it using change in energy levels,im getting it right , but why not this way ?

NOTE : Here i am thinking of the work done by the gravitational force , which is pointing downwards

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The work done by gravity is always W = ∫Fdr. Using 'r' as your variable of integration, the Force of gravity is always negative (in the direction of -r), F = -GMm/r^2.

The sign of the work is determined by the direction of integration. Let r1 < r2. So, when the body moves up the work is negative:
W = \int_{r_1}^{r_2} (-GMm/r^2)dr = GMm(1/r_2 - 1/r_1)
And when going down, the work is positive:
W = \int_{r_2}^{r_1} (-GMm/r^2)dr = GMm(1/r_1 - 1/r_2)
 
So does it mean that when the body is coming down, the gravity acts along -r? ie, in upwards direction? why? if you can explain
 
harjyot said:
So does it mean that when the body is coming down, the gravity acts along -r? ie, in upwards direction? why? if you can explain
Gravity acts down, of course, which is always in the -r direction. That's true regardless of whether the body is moving up or down.
 
Doc Al said:
Gravity acts down, of course, which is always in the -r direction. That's true regardless of whether the body is moving up or down.

I'm afraid Al I can't understand it properly, can u please be more specific?
ie, while going down
dw =f.dr (dot product ) = fdr (angle is zero right?) = -GMm /r^2.dr ..

while going up ,
dw =f.dr = -fdr (since angle is 180° ,so cos180°= -1)
= -(-GmM /r^2.dr )

is that it?
 
harjyot said:
I'm afraid Al I can't understand it properly, can u please be more specific?
I thought my previous post was quite specific. :smile:

In any case: W = ∫F.dr

When going up, F acts down and the displacement is up, so the work done by gravity is negative.

When going down, F acts down and the displacement is down, so the work done by gravity is positive.

But realize that the integration limits take care of the sign for you. Note that 'dr' is positive along the +r direction. So when you integrate from r1 to r2, which represents going up, the displacement is in the direction of positive r; when integrating from r2 to r1, which represents going down, the displacement is in the negative direction, opposite to dr.
 
Doc Al said:
I thought my previous post was quite specific. :smile:

In any case: W = ∫F.dr

When going up, F acts down and the displacement is up, so the work done by gravity is negative.

When going down, F acts down and the displacement is down, so the work done by gravity is positive.

But realize that the integration limits take care of the sign for you. Note that 'dr' is positive along the +r direction. So when you integrate from r1 to r2, which represents going up, the displacement is in the direction of positive r; when integrating from r2 to r1, which represents going down, the displacement is in the negative direction, opposite to dr.


so sir, that whenever I express work done by gravity dw = fdr ,and I don't need to express the sign by taking into account the angle? I mean why does this happen? because of the integration is it?

I'm sorry if I am irritating you, but I just want to understand
 
harjyot said:
so sir, that whenever I express work done by gravity dw = fdr ,and I don't need to express the sign by taking into account the angle? I mean why does this happen? because of the integration is it?

I'm sorry if I am irritating you, but I just want to understand

I'm sorry for this previous ,now I clearly understand the logic behind this. thanks a lot

:)
 
Excellent. (I was just about to respond to your previous post. Sorry for the delay. I'm glad you have it all straight now.)
 
  • #10
Doc Al said:
Excellent. (I was just about to respond to your previous post. Sorry for the delay. I'm glad you have it all straight now.)

indeed ,thanks for your help , i guess i was ignorant about the change in sign of small displacement 'dr' by the change in direction of integration itself , so i in my ignorance was actually jumbiling it both together

W =F.dr and dw=F*dr
now i realize that the signs of the forces and displacement automatically decide the sign and by using the dot product again on top of that , i was messing up the result .
THANK YOU!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K