What about physics before electroweak symmetry breaking?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of physics before electroweak symmetry breaking, particularly in the context of the standard model and its applicability to the early universe following the big bang. Participants explore the characteristics of particles, their interactions, and the role of various quantum numbers during this period.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the standard model without symmetry breaking can adequately describe the universe immediately after the big bang.
  • Another participant suggests that if there is no physics beyond the standard model at high energies, then the model should apply, with all particles being massless except for the Higgs boson, implying that all would travel at the speed of light.
  • It is proposed that electric charge would not be a useful quantum number in this context, with hypercharge and weak isospin being more relevant.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of massless particles, noting that protons and neutrons would not exist, only massless quarks and gluons.
  • There is mention of the necessity for new physics to explain the matter-antimatter asymmetry, which cannot be accounted for by the standard model alone.
  • A question is raised about the relevance of electric charge in relation to other quantum numbers, specifically T3 and Yw.
  • Another participant clarifies that while electric charge conservation remains valid, it does not provide additional information beyond the conservation of T3 and hypercharge.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the utility of electric charge as a quantum number and the implications of massless particles in the early universe. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the adequacy of the standard model in describing the universe before electroweak symmetry breaking.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the applicability of the standard model at high energies and the definitions of quantum numbers in this context. The discussion also highlights unresolved aspects of the matter-antimatter asymmetry.

naima
Gold Member
Messages
936
Reaction score
54
Hi Pf

I would like to know if the standard model without symmetry breaking can describe
the universe after the big bang before the moment when EW symmetry breaking occurred.
Had we v = c for all particles?
were electrons electrically charged? were there photons or B ? Z0 were not born?
Could anyone tell me what we know about this period?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there is no physics beyond the standard model (SM) up to very high energies, then yes the SM with an unbroken gauge symmetry should describe the particles and their interactions at temperatures higher than the phase transition temperature.

All SM particles would be massless except the higgs itself ( protons and neutrons woudn't exist, only massless quarks and gluons). massless of course implies v=c. At least one Additional particle which accounts for the dark matter is thought to exist, which may very well be massive even when the SM symmetry is unbroken.

Electric charge woudn't be a useful quantum number, rather hypercharge and weak isospin would be.

photons and Z bosons woudn't be useful degrees of freedom, rather [itex]B[/itex] and [itex]W^{1,2,3}[/itex] would be.

We know however, that some new physics must be relevant in order to produce the overabundance of matter over antimatter, which can't be explained in the framework of the SM. The asymmetry however might have been produced at temperatures much higher than the EW phase transition.
 
thank you
if T3 and Yw are good number why not Q (the sum T3 + Yw/2)?
 
The electric charge as defined will still be conserved, but its conservation won't give any further information on top of the conservation of [itex]T_{3}[/itex] and [itex]y[/itex] and thus would not be of any particular use.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K