What Are Ring Exchanges in Quantum Systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iibewegung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
iibewegung
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello condensed matter gurus out there,

I'm a new graduate student who's been trying to understand some sentences in a review article that reads:
-----
... One of Feynman's early successes with path integrals is often neglected, his mapping with path integrals of a quantum system onto a classical model of interacting "polymers." The polymers are ring exchanges of bosons in imaginary time. ...
-----
Now I have no clue what "ring exchanges" are... can anyone briefly explain it to me or point me to a reference? Google wasn't too helpful when I fed it ring, exchange, interaction, etc.
Thanks in advance.




PS. by the way, this article is Rev.Mod.Phys., v67 p279 by D.M. Ceperley
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ceperley has written some papers on (super)solid He, where he talks about ring exchanges. I think the idea, (from a talk he gave here some years ago, so my recollection is foggy) at least in that context, is that if you have a model based on a lattice, then the partition function of an N-particle system (living in this lattice) can be written as a sum over various arrangements of particle positions. These positions can be permuted about in N! ways, and I think, each permutation can be represented as a sum of "ring exchanges" - where you move one particle to a nearest-neighbor site, that one to one of its nearest neighbors, and so on, till the n'th particle is moved into the site vacated by the first particle.
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top