What are some common misconceptions about engineering science at U of T?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around common misconceptions about the engineering science program at the University of Toronto, including academic challenges, student experiences, and future prospects for graduates. Participants share insights on coursework, sleep habits, and the feasibility of pursuing minors alongside the engineering curriculum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express that the engineering science program is demanding, with many students reportedly dropping out after the first year.
  • There are mixed views on the advantages of the engineering science degree compared to traditional engineering programs, with some arguing that regular engineering degrees may lead to better job prospects due to potentially higher GPAs.
  • Concerns are raised about the financial implications of attending the program, particularly regarding scholarships and the cost of living, especially for those commuting from home.
  • Some participants mention that while it may be possible to minor in physics while studying engineering physics, it could be unnecessary given the overlap in coursework.
  • There are differing opinions on the value of advanced high school courses (like AP or IB) in preparing for the program, with some asserting that students without these backgrounds may face disadvantages in calculus and physics.
  • Future prospects for graduates, particularly regarding acceptance into prestigious graduate programs in the U.S., are discussed, with some participants noting that many engineering science graduates do gain admission to top schools.
  • One participant shares a personal aspiration to pursue research in quantum physics, expressing concern about financial stability and job prospects in that field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the overall value and prospects of the engineering science program compared to traditional engineering programs. There are multiple competing views regarding the impact of high school preparation, the feasibility of minoring in physics, and the financial implications of the program.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight the potential disadvantages for students who did not take advanced high school courses, as well as the financial burden of the program, which remains unresolved. The discussion also reflects varying personal experiences and expectations regarding the program's rigor and future opportunities.

  • #31
ThreeOfClubs said:
I am actually very interested about this program. But I see that Mechanical Engineering isn't listed as an option to major in the last two years. Is Mechanical engineering disguised as a major option under a different name. Or does one end up learning mechanical engineering in the first two years ? Or if I'm interested in MechE is it better to just do the regular program.

I believe it has an Aerospace engineering option. An aero major will take very similar courses as an undergrad to a mech. However, I'm not sure how close the engineering science with an option in aerospace is to a straight up mech program (in terms of actual courses in the programs). You should compare the two programs (mech vs engsci aerospace) to see how closely related they are. If you want to do research in mech/aerospace, the engsci option will probably be better, if you just want a job after graduation, straight mech would probably be better. Again, I have not looked at the actual courses a mech major takes versus an engsci aerospace major, specifically at UofT.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
You should also consider that employers may not understand that MechE degree may be equivalent to an Aerospace EngSci degree -- not that they are equivalent... they may or may not be.

So, it could possibly make it more difficult to get a MechE job.
 
  • #33
Kevin_Axion said:
Eng Sci seems like a waste of time and is only useful if you wish to pursue graduate school after your undergrad in which case you should just get a BSc.

I almost went with an Eng Phys degree because (and what a concept!) I wanted to learn about engineering as well as physics.

And I'm sorry to do this... But you're doing an awful lot of talking about what something is worth in industry, but your profile says you're a high school student.
 
  • #34
zif. said:
I almost went with an Eng Phys degree because (and what a concept!) I wanted to learn about engineering as well as physics.

And I'm sorry to do this... But you're doing an awful lot of talking about what something is worth in industry, but your profile says you're a high school student.

You're absolutely correct I am a high school student. In fact I'm not sure what relevance it has to the discussion other then the lack of experience I may have. That is irrelevant anyways since most of my opinions are based off other's opinions who have gone into EngSci and who have gone into the regular engineering path at U of T.

I wasn't in anyway trying to degrade the value of an EngSci degree in industry but merely asking the question or rather suggesting the common opinion that not many employers know the difference between an EngSci degree and a regular engineering degree. Following from this premise wouldn't you think it would be logical to go into the regular engineering path and get a higher GPA since employers view EngSci and regular engineering on the same grounds. Also regular engineering is more general which is more desirable for employers i.e mechanical engineering, ECE, Electrical Engineering and Chemical Engineering. In that since it would be a waste of time to go into EngSci if you just wish to go into industry and compete for the same jobs as regular engineers whom are more desirable for said reasons.
 
  • #35
Would one end up with less skill (for industry) in the major of their choice in EngSci as opposed to going The regular program?
 
  • #36
really depends on luck, interview, connections , reccomendations , timing, ability to sell yourself, skills, internships, coop, experience,

these would matter a lot more than
you either being engineering science/ engineering other regular majors
 
  • #37
Hopefully you are still lurking around this forum :)

I am really anxious because my average is not enough to get into EngSci programme. (The department requires IB predicted grade of 35 but I think I have something like 32). But I really want to get into Engineering Physics programme. So if I boost my predicted grade up to 36 or get a final result of 36, do you think they will give me an offeR?
 
  • #38
Kevin_Axion said:
You're absolutely correct I am a high school student. In fact I'm not sure what relevance it has to the discussion other then the lack of experience I may have. That is irrelevant anyways since most of my opinions are based off other's opinions who have gone into EngSci and who have gone into the regular engineering path at U of T.

I wasn't in anyway trying to degrade the value of an EngSci degree in industry but merely asking the question or rather suggesting the common opinion that not many employers know the difference between an EngSci degree and a regular engineering degree. Following from this premise wouldn't you think it would be logical to go into the regular engineering path and get a higher GPA since employers view EngSci and regular engineering on the same grounds. Also regular engineering is more general which is more desirable for employers i.e mechanical engineering, ECE, Electrical Engineering and Chemical Engineering. In that since it would be a waste of time to go into EngSci if you just wish to go into industry and compete for the same jobs as regular engineers whom are more desirable for said reasons.

This is wrong. Really wrong.

Eng Sci is THE MOST USEFUL. There is tons of information on this but I will repeat it. Eng Sci take all the hard courses from other disciplines. Their undergrad degree is the most prestigious in U of T, which makes it one of the most prestigious undergrad degrees in Canada.

Eng Sci students get high end job offers from large engineering companies after graduation. A friend of mine graduated recently and got several offered positions with a 6 figure salary. This is equal to a petrolium engineer, but above the rest.

I can only assume you made guesses about the job opportunity for an Eng Sci degree. Facts are not in your favor.
 
  • #39
n_student said:
This is wrong. Really wrong.

Eng Sci is THE MOST USEFUL. There is tons of information on this but I will repeat it. Eng Sci take all the hard courses from other disciplines. Their undergrad degree is the most prestigious in U of T, which makes it one of the most prestigious undergrad degrees in Canada.

Eng Sci students get high end job offers from large engineering companies after graduation. A friend of mine graduated recently and got several offered positions with a 6 figure salary. This is equal to a petrolium engineer, but above the rest.

I can only assume you made guesses about the job opportunity for an Eng Sci degree. Facts are not in your favor.

Alright, let's begin with contradiction number one:

"I can only assume you made guesses about the job opportunity for an Eng Sci degree."

And you state: "Eng Sci is THE MOST USEFUL"

A purely opinionated statement.

"There is tons of information on this but I will repeat it. Eng Sci take all the hard courses from other disciplines. Their undergrad degree is the most prestigious in U of T, which makes it one of the most prestigious undergrad degrees in Canada."

Provide me a quantitative definition of prestige. Beyond that, give me an external source that states that Eng Sci is the best engineering degree.

"Eng Sci students get high end job offers from large engineering companies after graduation. A friend of mine graduated recently and got several offered positions with a 6 figure salary. This is equal to a petrolium engineer, but above the rest."

Brilliant, you have pulled a single student from the program and extend their success to everyone else, I'm sorry but that isn't how a general census is done.

Also, all of my "guesses" are actually based on dozens of people I've spoken too who have gone into the program and have had friends go into the program. If you want a challenge, fine do it, but learning about quantum mechanics and complex analysis may not be a trait that employers find completely useful. Employers purely look for workplace experience and GPA the former may give an Eng Sci the advantage but the latter is hard to come by, Eng Sci is really tough and if you want to take the risk, go for it.
 
  • #40
n_student said:
This is wrong. Really wrong.

Eng Sci is THE MOST USEFUL. There is tons of information on this but I will repeat it. Eng Sci take all the hard courses from other disciplines. Their undergrad degree is the most prestigious in U of T, which makes it one of the most prestigious undergrad degrees in Canada.

Eng Sci students get high end job offers from large engineering companies after graduation. A friend of mine graduated recently and got several offered positions with a 6 figure salary. This is equal to a petrolium engineer, but above the rest.

I can only assume you made guesses about the job opportunity for an Eng Sci degree. Facts are not in your favor.

I see, you've been fed the U of T EngSci propaganda. What you said is really not true at all. It may be (one of) the most prestigious degrees in Canada because of the difficulty, but EngSci grads almost always compete for the same jobs are engineers who went into regular programs. Do a quick job search and you'll see how many employers ask or care for an EngSci degree. What makes you think EngSci grads will get paid more than a grad who went through a regular program? They're (in most cases) going to have the exact same jobs as the regular folks, which translates to same salary.

EngSci is designed for people who do not know what they want to do, or for people who are unsure between science and engineering. That's why you pick a major after two years. It's also for those who want a challenge. Simple fact: EngSci jobs do not exist. There is no advantage in terms of jobs if you go into EngSci.

That being said, I highly recommend EngSci if you're unsure as to what engineering to pursue or are having major troubles deciding between engineering and science.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K