- 1,902
- 3
mattmns said:I am guessing you are referring to me dduardo? I posted that bug report in April 2005. I have not had any response though.
I don't know what to say. It doesn't happen to me.
mattmns said:I am guessing you are referring to me dduardo? I posted that bug report in April 2005. I have not had any response though.
Moonbear said:So, someone replied to the poll with "other." What "other" browser is out there? Will whoever clicked that one speak up and share?
Nylex said:I'm using Mozilla 1.7.5, since it came with Slackware. If it didn't, I probably would be using Firefox.

dduardo said:Which browser do you use? If your using IE you should consider switching to firefox:
http://www.mozilla.org/
Pengwuino said:I hear Microsoft is trying to make a big step with IE7. Tabbed browsing, "real security"... some other crap... probably won't work so I am sticken with Da Fox.
mattmns said:You get to use "special stuff"? Did not you say a while ago that your IE at work does not even have tabs? Tabs in the sense of firefox's tabs, not tasbar buttons![]()
*Kia* said:Why?
I have IE, Firefox, Netscape and Opera installed (to test my webpages).
IE has more functions, better usability, and many of my special effects and scripts are not understood by browsers such as firefox, meaning extra coding so these browsers do not misinterpret them.
When other browsers catch up and look and feel less chunky and childlike then maybe...
Using a non-tabbed browser doesn't mean you have to use only the forward backward history. You can do what you described without tabs. To open links in new windows on PC running IE, click while holding the shift key down. Alt-Tab goes back to the original page, even while that page is loading. Then you can shift-click another link, and so on. Once you have 40 windows open, you can flip through them with Alt-Tab (goes to the previous windows(s) visited) and with Shift-Alt-Tab (goes the opposite direction of Alt-Tab in your windows stack.faust9 said:tabbed browsing is infinetly more productive than non-tabbed. Imagine a page with multiple links---say a uC site with 18 versions of the same chip. Hold the apple key(I'm a mac user so you can take the MS-specific non-standard HTML and stick it where the sun doesn't shine) and click through all of the variations. Hold down apple+option and arrow through each of the open tabs---easy and quicker than opening links in different windows(organization wise) and much much quicker than using forward and backward history.
well it sucks, but there's AOLMoonbear said:So, someone replied to the poll with "other." What "other" browser is out there? Will whoever clicked that one speak up and share?
hitssquad said:Using a non-tabbed browser doesn't mean you have to use only the forward backward history. You can do what you described without tabs. To open links in new windows on PC running IE, click while holding the shift key down. Alt-Tab goes back to the original page, even while that page is loading. Then you can shift-click another link, and so on. Once you have 40 windows open, you can flip through them with Alt-Tab (goes to the previous windows(s) visited) and with Shift-Alt-Tab (goes the opposite direction of Alt-Tab in your windows stack.
In short, both systems (tab browsing and non-tab browsing) use windows stacks. Both let you flip through them at ultra-high-speed with key-combinations. Both give you information about the pages in your stack (with IE, when you activate window stack navigation (Alt-Tab, lift up the Tab key but hold down the Alt key) the target window is described, and also has a distinctive icon for different programs (the window stack navigator for IE functions with all running applications, so I can be browsing the web and instantly switch back and forth between that and my encyclopedia program, my unabridged dictionary, Mathematica, Google Earth, Widows Media Player, Opera (for viewing flash web pages), calculator, text editor windows, file folder windows, iTunes, GIMP, Excel, etc., in addition to usually over 40 web pages all surfed simultaneously and all on one XGA monitor)).
I have tried tabs and they do not increase the functionality of my window stack navigation. People have watched me multi-task on PC computers running IE and their eyes pop out of their heads. They say, "What was *that*? How did you *do* that?" The only thing tabs do is waste space and distract me.
...To another window.mattmns said:And if I were to use the taskbar with IE, I would have to click twice just to get to a new page.
Does it automatically re-order your window stack according to most-recently visited windows? IE does.mattmns said:Personally I use rocker mouse gestures on firefox as this allows me to quickly scroll through tabs
hitssquad said:Does it automatically re-order your window stack according to most-recently visited windows? IE does.
I like that. It has a nice ring to it:dduardo said:That would be total chaos if the tabs started rearanging themselves.
This is the same way I feel about IE. I code elegant standard ECMAscript and DOM scripting, and IE either goes belly-up by not supporting some standard object, or interprets some command in an utterly non-standard death-defying way, so that I end up having to trudge through MSDN's DHTML library to find IE's utterly proprietary object/implementation in their proprietary "Jscript" format and try to fork the code by detecting supported objects (as browser detection is unreliable). In many cases, IE sees errors in lines it shouldn't even be reading by standard protocol, so you eventually end up having to lobotomize the best parts of your code to get a functioning cross-browser script. Even if you don't have to do this, you still end up with a longer script whose only excuse is support for IE.*Kia* said:I have IE, Firefox, Netscape and Opera installed (to test my webpages).
IE has more functions, better usability, and many of my special effects and scripts are not understood by browsers such as firefox, meaning extra coding so these browsers do not misinterpret them.
*Kia* said:Why?
I have IE, Firefox, Netscape and Opera installed (to test my webpages).
IE has more functions, better usability, and many of my special effects and scripts are not understood by browsers such as firefox, meaning extra coding so these browsers do not misinterpret them.
When other browsers catch up and look and feel less chunky and childlike then maybe...
So how many extensions do you have to download and install in FF in order for the fancy websites to work? The standard browser does not look spectacular to me.dduardo said:2) I've had to redesign web interfaces to avoid, as hypermorphism so elequently said: lobotomizing my code, just because IE is so crippled.
Monique said:So how many extensions do you have to download and install in FF in order for the fancy websites to work? The standard browser does not look spectacular to me.
Monique said:So, how do I get FF to ask me what I want to do with a file I want to download (open, save, save and open folder, save and launch). Do I need to extension OpenDownload or is it already built in?
Actually I find it annoying. First I have to browse through all my directories to save into the right folder (it doesn't remember the last locations and I don't want to save in a single place). Then when it has saved it, I have to go to Windows Explorer and find the file again to launch or unpack itdduardo said:That's already built in. I also don't see IE with a nice download manager.

Monique said:Actually I find it annoying. First I have to browse through all my directories to save into the right folder (it doesn't remember the last locations and I don't want to save in a single place). Then when it has saved it, I have to go to Windows Explorer and find the file again to launch or unpack it![]()
Nope, not even with the opendownload extension. I get a little popup window in the bottom right that the download has finished, the downloads window is empty and I'm off to find the file.dduardo said:2) If you elected to just download the file, once the file is finished downloading there will be a link to open the file in the download manager.