Medical What are the costs for tests to measure bacteria and virus levels on surfaces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LightningInAJar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    cleaning Testing
AI Thread Summary
Testing the effectiveness of disinfectants on surfaces can be costly, particularly in the UK, where lab tests are expensive. In the U.S., options include germicide cleaning kits designed for public spaces, which can be used before testing. It's essential to understand that testing often requires culturing samples, which may necessitate various culture media depending on the microorganisms of interest. Local health departments can provide guidance on certified laboratories and testing options. The effectiveness of disinfectants is influenced by factors such as concentration, surface type, organic matter presence, exposure duration, and temperature. While testing can yield insights, it's important to recognize that many microbes are persistent, and some cannot be cultured. Existing research on disinfectant efficacy may also offer valuable information.
LightningInAJar
Messages
251
Reaction score
33
TL;DR Summary
What are the costs for tests to measure bacteria and virus levels on surfaces?
I would like to test how well disinfectants work when cleaning surfaces, but am worried getting lab work done would be pricey. Any suggestions?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
LightningInAJar said:
TL;DR Summary: What are the costs for tests to measure bacteria and virus levels on surfaces?

I would like to test how well disinfectants work when cleaning surfaces, but am worried getting lab work done would be pricey. Any suggestions?
Are you UK? These tests are pricey. ATTC. I can look into type of test and range of microorganisms for you.
The qualitative are obviously cheaper.
 
Last edited:
LightningInAJar said:
TL;DR Summary: What are the costs for tests to measure bacteria and virus levels on surfaces?

I would like to test how well disinfectants work when cleaning surfaces, but am worried getting lab work done would be pricey. Any suggestions?
I'm in work tomo so you DM me if you want.
 
pinball1970 said:
Are you UK? These tests are pricey. ATTC. I can look into type of test and range of microorganisms for you.
The qualitative are obviously cheaper.
No, I'm in the U.S.
 
LightningInAJar said:
No, I'm in the U.S.
I'll DM you Tomo when I'm in the office.
 
I assume a sample always needs to be cultured for a day or two to get up to measurable levels?
 
Not sure about what you need. If you culture bacteria and virus you usually have to use lots of different culture media. This means you have to have a good idea about species you want to test for. For example, human poop has several hundred species of bacteria. (+-5500) One petri dish probably will get a small percentage only. Because most humans have only a small percentage of all the extant available gut microbes.
 
jim mcnamara said:
Not sure about what you need. If you culture bacteria and virus you usually have to use lots of different culture media. This means you have to have a good idea about species you want to test for. For example, human poop has several hundred species of bacteria. (+-5500) One petri dish probably will get a small percentage only. Because most humans have only a small percentage of all the extant available gut microbes.

Sinks, counters, and toilet seats mostly.
 
In the US there are germicide cleaning kits you can buy - that are meant for public buildings like restaurants. Use the germicide/fungicide/cleanser first -- then test. All of what you need is available in a kit .
 
  • #10
Coinky-dink? At this very moment I am trying to find a Salmonella test kit. I found them at online pharma labs but not at Amazon. (Canada)
 
  • #11
I did not know "country" for this discussion. Bear that in mind.

Restaurant supply outlets (not a chain) just a general term -- has the kits you want. The county (or whatever government entity) you are in usually influences the content of test kits.
 
  • #12
jim mcnamara said:
In the US there are germicide cleaning kits you can buy - that are meant for public buildings like restaurants. Use the germicide/fungicide/cleanser first -- then test. All of what you need is available in a kit .
The kit includes antiseptics and a test to determine what survived?
 
  • #13
What is in the kit may (my opinion) be a political football. Example:
Clorox 5% for general cleanup, and then food prep surfaces may require stronger concentrations.
The kind of test(s) environments vary - some include everything, others mean you have to cruise the aisles. Some might require you to send a sample to a lab if it is a public building. First aid stations had that requirement at a small clinic where I worked long ago. This kind of mandated testing is often provided ad libitum and at no cost.

Go to a restaurant supply place and check it out. The reason I'm being vague is that fact that you really need to talk with your local public health worker bees or staff at the supply place. Not me.

But you have the idea.
 
  • Like
Likes LightningInAJar
  • #14
LightningInAJar said:
TL;DR Summary: What are the costs for tests to measure bacteria and virus levels on surfaces?

I would like to test how well disinfectants work when cleaning surfaces, but am worried getting lab work done would be pricey. Any suggestions?
In the US, one should be able to obtain information on testing from State and or local (municipal or county) health departments. They should be able to inform one about testing and certified laboratories.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes LightningInAJar and berkeman
  • #15
Sounds good. Thanks all.
 
  • #16
It's not within your capability to execute relevant tests. You'll always find microbes - and pathogens like Salmonella would be so rare in normal households, you'd be very very unlikely get a detect much less something of statistical significance.
 
  • Like
Likes LightningInAJar
  • #17
The problem with this is to assess the effectiveness you would have to be specific about the disinfectant, in what concentration, the type of surface, the presence of organic contaminants, the length of time the organisms are exposed to the chemical, the temperature and the organisms being targeted. A disinfectant in a liquid at low concentrations will generally become colonised with something and the presence of organic matter significantly interferes with a lot of disinfectants. In clinical settings disinfectants that contain bleach seem to have become popular because of their wide range of activity. Its actually quite difficult to use chemicals to sterilize a surface without the risk of damage or risk of toxicity, once life gets going it is nothing if not persistent. There are also organisms that simply can't be cultured, I think the advice about talking to people involved with public health is certainly a good idea.
It's worth remembering that people have been doing these sorts of tests for a long time and there is already a vast amount of research available, can't that be used.?
 
  • Like
Likes LightningInAJar and BillTre
Back
Top