Intro Physics What are the differences between physics textbooks for engineers and scientists?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pochen Liu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Textbooks
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences between physics textbooks for engineers and scientists, specifically comparing "Physics for Engineers and Scientists" 5th edition with "Fundamentals of Physics" 10th edition by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker. Participants agree that while the content may be similar, the approach and explanations vary significantly between authors. Readers are encouraged to switch textbooks if they find a particular text challenging, as different authors make varying assumptions about the reader's prior knowledge and terminology. This variability can impact comprehension, especially in more advanced topics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts
  • Familiarity with textbook structures and educational methodologies
  • Knowledge of author-specific styles in educational materials
  • Ability to identify personal learning preferences
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore different editions of "Fundamentals of Physics" for varied explanations
  • Research author backgrounds and their pedagogical approaches
  • Investigate supplementary resources for challenging physics topics
  • Learn about the impact of textbook sequencing on learning outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Students in engineering and physics disciplines, educators selecting textbooks, and anyone seeking to enhance their understanding of physics through varied educational resources.

Pochen Liu
Messages
52
Reaction score
2
I am working through physics for engineers and scientists 5th edition right now. I have met many people who strongly believe a certain textbook is better than others.

Can someone please clarify the differences? I have access to Fundamentals of physics 10th edition and wondered if working through that would make a difference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a subjective opinion, at the introductory level there is little difference between texts.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint
As far as content is concerned their may little difference but I think that there is a difference in the approach and explanations that various authors use. I have read some book that some topic took a bit of rereading in order to fully understand the topic. Authors make unconscious assumptions about and understanding of knowledge or the use of terminology of the reader. So if a subject does seem a little abstruse try another book. This issue may be more prevalent in more advanced books.
 
Not specific to Engineering or Physics -
If at any level, one finds a textbook is not doing what you hope for it to do for you, try an alternative book. Maybe some differences in sequence of topics; maybe some slight differences in commentary; one may give you something to hook into which the assigned book did not. My example was of learning (or trying to) proofs by Mathematical Induction when studying College Algebra ("Elementary Functions"), only to find a different book THIRTY YEARS LATER, which is what helped me finally understand and be able to do some.
 
Pochen Liu said:
physics for engineers and scientists 5th edition
By whom? Most textbook titles are generic, so most people tend to remember them by the names of their authors.

I know "Fundamentals of Physics" is probably Halliday, Resnick and Walker (when I was a student it was just Halliday and Resnick). However, even with textbooks that I've actually taught from, I remember the authors more easily than the titles.
 
i am self learning physics. have you ever worked your way backwards again after finishing most undergrad courses? i have textbooks for junior/senior physics courses in classical mechanics, electrodynamics, thermal physics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical methods for self learning. i have the Halliday Resnick sophomore book. working backwards, i checked out Conceptual Physics 11th edition by Hewitt and found this book very helpful. What i liked most was how stimulating the pictures...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K