What Are the Key Characteristics of Inertial Waves in Uniform Rotation?

Click For Summary
Inertial waves in uniform rotation are characterized by a velocity field that can be expressed mathematically, leading to a corresponding vorticity. Small perturbations to this uniform state can be modeled as plane harmonic waves, with the amplitude needing to be sufficiently small to ensure linear terms dominate in the momentum equation. The linearized momentum equation can be manipulated to derive a dispersion relation for the waves. Inertial waves exhibit specific polarization properties and are typically dispersive, with their group velocity directionally related to the wavenumber vector. The discussion also raises the question of whether the fluid is incompressible, which is relevant for the analysis.
Angelo Pascal
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
New poster has been reminded to show their work on schoolwork problems
Homework Statement
Consider an inviscid fluid in a uniformly rotating frame of reference. The effect of
gravity is neglected. In the frame rotating with an angular velocity Ω, the momentum
equation governing the fluid flow is given by:
du/dt = ∂u/∂t + (u · ∇) u = −1/ρ (∇pr) − 2Ω × u
where u is the velocity field, ρ is the density of the fluid and pr= p − ((|Ω| |x⊥|)^2)/2
is the reduced pressure, where p is pressure and x⊥ is the perpendicular distance from
the position vector x to the rotation axis.
We consider the dynamics of inertial waves, i.e. small perturbations to the state of
uniform rotation.
Relevant Equations
The questions are below.
(a) Write down an expression for the velocity field corresponding to uniform
rotation. Find the vorticity corresponding to this flow.

(b) Consider a small perturbation u' to the state of uniform rotation with angular
velocity Ω, which has the form of a plane harmonic wave
u'= A exp i(k·x−ω t) + A*exp -i(k·x−ω t)
where k is the wavenumber vector, ω is the frequency, A is the complex
amplitude and A* is its complex conjugate.
How small does the amplitude A need to be for the nonlinear (with respect to A) terms to be much smaller than the linear ones in the momentum equation?

(c) Consider the linearised momentum equation and derive the dispersion relation
ω = ω (k). (Hint: Take the curl of the momentum equation and use the identity
∇ × (Ω × u) = − (Ω · ∇) u.)

(d) What is the polarisation of the inertial waves?

(e) Are these waves dispersive or non-dispersive? Isotropic or anisotropic? Explain why. Find the group velocity for the inertial waves and comment on its
relative direction with respect to the wavenumber vector.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show us what you've done on this so far.
 
Did the original problem say anything about the fluid being incompressible?
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...