Is there any fundamental difference between the 3 dimensions of space that we experience. Such as the difference that we intuitively feel between the time and space dimensions
Usually in calculations we assume there isn't. For example, in physics the z-axis has a special meaning. Not because there is something physically significant about it, but on the contrary: we assume all spatial dimensions are equivalent and we can rotate our coordinate system in any way convenient to us. So we usually take it to be such that important vectors lie along the axis (e.g. a field along the z-axis, or a pendulum swinging in the x-y plane). If they weren't, we would not be able to do this.
Of course, in "real life" we are usually in a gravitational field so we will have an intuitive sense of what is "up" and "down". So we have a sort of naturally aligned "z-axis". But the plane perpendicular to that is not fixed in that way. Otherwise, we wouldn't need stuff like compasses to agree on a non ambiguous way to describe directions (in fact I heard that there are certain people who always indicate directions relative to themselves, using "left" and "right" and who would probably find the idea of a fixed "north" direction ridiculous and incomprehensible).
1. The Big Idea:
According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box.
2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process
Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy.
Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/
by @robphy