What Are the Latest Breakthroughs and Research Topics in M Theory?

beno23
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
does anyone know what are the most recent developments and breakthroughs on m theory...i don't seem to find anything big since holographic principle few years ago.

if there haven't been any big breakthroughs than what are the topics that are being studied right now?

does anyone know any useful website for this?

thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There isn't really anything new as String Theorists don't have a clear explanation of the theory. Although there was some progress in Matrix Theory about 12 years ago. Currently, there has been a lot of research in AdS/CFT which is a non-perturbative form of String Theory, which means it doesn't rely on power series approximations.
 
Last edited:
The most recent development in M-theory was the "membrane minirevolution", in which new equations describing the fields on a stack of M2-branes were discovered (google BLG and ABJM for details, and it originates from "Basu-Harvey"). There's also been a lot of work on the more challenging M5-brane - e.g. two papers at arxiv last week, 1012.2880 and 1012.2882 - but there hasn't been a clear breakthrough there.

Other lines of inquiry include Martin Cederwall's use of pure spinors, Hisham Sati's ideas (also see Pierre Ramond's papers during the last 10 years), the various attempts to show that E10 or E11 is a hidden symmetry of M-theory, and also work on "generalized geometry". There's plenty of thinking and incremental progress occurring, and eventually quantity will become quality - someone will look at it all and say, wow, that all adds up to ... some big new insight about how the theory works. But until that happens, we just have technical progress and vague speculations.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top