What are the options for boundary conditions in ANSYS WB structural analysis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on boundary conditions in ANSYS Workbench (WB) for structural analysis, specifically for a 5 mm thick plate. Users are advised to apply static support on one end to achieve proper reaction forces, while being aware of potential singularities at the edges. The preferred method involves kinematic constraints to allow deformation without rigid body motion, specifically by fixing a central node and applying zero translations at strategic points. This approach yields the most accurate simulation results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ANSYS Workbench Mechanical
  • Knowledge of kinematic constraints in structural analysis
  • Familiarity with static support and reaction forces
  • Basic principles of finite element analysis (FEA)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research kinematic constraints in ANSYS Workbench
  • Learn about applying loads and boundary conditions in FEA
  • Explore methods to prevent rigid body motion in simulations
  • Study the effects of singularities in structural analysis
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for structural engineers, simulation analysts, and anyone involved in finite element modeling using ANSYS Workbench, particularly those looking to optimize boundary conditions for accurate results.

raunak(esmilo)
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am trying to perform a simple simulation in ANSYS WB Mechanical. Description is given below in image, thickness of the plate is 5 mm. Problem is I am unable to decide which type of support should I provide for this.
 

Attachments

  • WS9.jpg
    WS9.jpg
    14.7 KB · Views: 703
Engineering news on Phys.org
Static support on one end - this will give propper reaction forces.
Note however that you migh get singularities on the edges of that face. That is normal hence you can ignore them.
 
Boundary conditions for this kind of problem are a bit of an art form, ideally you will want to "kinematically constrain" the block such that it can deform but not have any rigid body motion. Based on the forces being applied you have a few options I can think of:

  1. Strive's solution: fix the nodes on one side of the block, apply 40 kN to the opposite side. This has the disadvantage of not allowing deformation in the x-direction along that face. This may be a problem depending on your desired analysis outcome.
  2. Possible alternative: apply the loads at the edges of the block and use no deformation constraints. This will result in "weak springs" being added to the model to prevent rigid body motion (http://xansys.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=86806); in theory you will still get a usable result.
  3. Preferred solution: constrain the block using kinematic principles. Assuming this is a 2-d analysis I would recommend defining a node in the center of the block and apply zero X and Y translation (prevents rigid body motion); also apply zero Y translation at a single node at the midpoint edge of the block. This will prevent rigid body motion (center node) and rotation (edge node), and should give you the most "idealized" response for the block (i.e. it will expand and deform as if floating in space with nothing holding it).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K