What are the physical mechanisms behind time dilation and its alternatives?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanisms behind time dilation, primarily asserting that it is a geometric effect of spacetime rather than a local phenomenon. Participants agree that time dilation cannot be explained by any theory other than relativity, emphasizing that it is an observational effect dependent on relative motion. The Lorentz Transformation is highlighted as a key method for understanding time dilation through spacetime diagrams. The conversation also touches on alternative theories, but consensus remains that relativity provides the most accurate framework for explaining time dilation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Special Relativity and its principles
  • Familiarity with Lorentz Transformation and spacetime diagrams
  • Basic knowledge of observational effects in physics
  • Concept of inertial reference frames (IRFs)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lorentz Transformation in detail to grasp its application in time dilation
  • Explore spacetime diagrams to visualize the effects of relative motion
  • Research the concept of relativity of simultaneity and its implications
  • Investigate alternative theories of time and space beyond the standard model of physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the fundamental concepts of time and space, particularly those studying or teaching Special Relativity and its implications.

  • #31
phyti said:
If time dilation cannot be explained in terms of fundamental physical processes, then there is no understanding.
I hope you are not confusing time dilation, the coordinate effect, with differential ageing, which is coordinate independent. The examples you give are based on proper times, and so confirm differential aging, not time dilation.

The problem with ascribing a physical change to a coordinate dependent quantity is that it immediately leads to a contradiction or paradox.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
phyti said:
The issue here is not time dilation but the response implying there is no physical cause.
In the Hafele-Keating experiment, the clocks differed in accumulated time, and it wasn't because someone was looking at them. In the muon experiment, the larger fraction of survivors for the high speed particles was not because someone was looking at them. Viewing from the fast muon frame does not alter the percentage of survivors in the lab particles, i.e. you can't change the qty of particles in a sample by looking at it from a different reference point. The differences are real between objects compared together, therefore there are explanations in terms of physical processes. If time dilation cannot be explained in terms of fundamental physical processes, then there is no understanding. It's like pressing buttons on a TV, without knowing how the picture gets there! The coordinate transformations don't explain anything, they just provide a means of calculation from one frame to another.
As Mentz alluded to, Time Dilation does not have a physical cause but Differential Aging does and it is the Lorentz Transformation that provides that mechanism, not as applied to the coordinates of events in different frames but rather as it is applied to the laws of physics. Prior to Einstein, Lorentz and other scientists assumed that there was an absolute rest state in which light propagated at c and in which clocks and rulers were correct. They assumed that our clocks and rulers were incorrect and were physically distorted by moving through the ether and so they looked for an explanation. Einstein, on the other hand, determined that the same Transformation that Lorentz had figured out as applied to the laws of optics needed to be applied to every law of physics and so all the laws were modified to make them invariant under a Lorentz Transformation and that provides all the mechanism or physical explanation for differential aging and all the other observables that are the result of the Principle of Relativity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
752