What Are the Roots of a Given Quartic Polynomial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomials
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the value of A in the quartic polynomial x^4 + x^3 + Ax^2 + 4x - 2 = 0, given that the roots are expressed as reciprocals of certain variables. Participants suggest substituting the roots into the polynomial and equating coefficients to derive equations involving A and the roots. They explore various methods to manipulate these equations, including using identities and simultaneous equations, but encounter challenges due to the nonlinear nature of the equations. Ultimately, it is noted that while a specific numeric value for A cannot be determined without numerical values for the roots, an expression for A in terms of the roots can be established. The conversation highlights the complexity of solving quartic equations and the interplay between roots and coefficients.
  • #61
kuruman said:
OK, suppose as you say ##A=-1##. Then the equation becomes
##x^4+x^3-x^2+4x-2=0##
Now you claim that ##x_1=-2## is a root. This means that if I replace ##x## with ##(-2)## in the equation, the left hand side must evaluate to zero. Let's see,
##(-2)^4+(-2)^3-(-2)^2+4(-2)-2=16-8-4-2=16-14=2.## Therefore your claim that ##x_1=-2## is a root is incorrect. The point here is that once you pick ##A=-1## all 4 roots are specified. I gave you these roots in post #46. One of them is ##x_1=−2.32708.## Let's see how that works with ##A=-1.##
##(−2.32708)^4+(−2.32708)^3-(−2.32708)^2+4(−2.32708)-2=29.3254-12.6018-5.4153-9.30832-2=-0.00002\approx 0.## Thus, to within round-off accuracy, ##x_1=−2.32708## is a root for ##A=-1.##

The point here is that once you pick ##A##, all 4 roots are uniquely specified. Conversely, once you pick one root, ##A## and the three remaining roots are uniquely specified.

To get root ##-5.50427##, first I picked a numerical value for ##A##. As mentioned above, once I did that all four roots were uniquely specified. I obtained all four by using Mathematica to solve the equation and posted them in #32. To see how all this helps you solve the original problem, please do what I asked in post #53 and what you said you do in post #54 but have not done yet: Substitute one root ##x_1=-5.50427## in the equation leaving ##A## alone and see what you get. For good measure, repeat with another root, ##x_2=4.34094## for the same choice of ##A## and see what you get this time. Then we'll talk again.
I understand your point, very clear, remember you are assigning values for either ##A## or a root value. My question is, in that problem "are we able to solve without assigning the values like the way you have done?"The approach of assigning values implies that ##A## may take any value dependant on the roots. What exactly do you mean by saying that i am half way to getting the solution?Were you envisaging assigning of values?If this is the case, how would this help in solving that problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
chwala said:
I understand your point, very clear, remember you are assigning values for either ##A## or a root value. My question is, in that problem "are we able to solve without assigning the values like the way you have done?"The approach of assigning values implies that ##A## may take any value dependant on the roots.
Good. You came to that understanding at post #50. This understanding is crucial to answering the question.
chwala said:
What exactly do you mean by saying that i am half way to getting the solution?
I mean that you reached the crucial understanding I mentioned above. I believe that without it you would not be able to each the answer and you would be going around in circles producing more and more equations.
chwala said:
Were you envisaging assigning of values?
Assigning values to what?
chwala said:
If this is the case, how would this help in solving that problem?
The problem gave you the roots ##1/\Theta,~1/\Psi,~1/\phi,## and ##~1/\xi~##. If you do what I asked you in post #60, namely
kuruman said:
"Substitute one root ##x_1=-5.50427## in the equation leaving ##A## alone and see what you get. For good measure, repeat with another root, ##x_2=4.34094## for the same choice of ##A## and see what you get this time"
then you will see for yourself how to get ##A## for two numerical values of the roots. From that, you should be able to deduce how to get ##A## for any set of roots such as ##1/\Theta,~1/\Psi,~1/\phi,## and ##~1/\xi~##.

If you do not do what I asked you in post #60, then I will stop posting on this thread until you do.
 
  • #63
Thank you for your insight.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K