Studying What Books Can Help Me Learn Physics on My Own?

AI Thread Summary
A mechanical engineering major with a minor in physics at San Jose State University seeks recommendations for books to deepen their understanding of physics, aspiring to become a theoretical physicist. They express a strong interest in learning beyond their coursework, despite not yet taking physics classes. Recommendations include "Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems" by Thornton and Marion for intermediate physics, "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by Griffiths for electricity and magnetism, and "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths for quantum physics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of balancing extracurricular learning with academic responsibilities, suggesting that students should focus on their courses first before investing in additional textbooks, which can be costly. The participant's passion for physics drives their desire to master the subject.
Henry Menendez
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
So, I am majoring in mechanical engineering with a minor in physics at San Jose State University. I want to learn as much as possible with physics by reading books and taking my future courses at SJSU, but I don't know what books to read. Any recommendations? I want to get pretty close to becoming a theoretical physicist, physics fascinates me and I want to become as knowledgeable as possible with the subject. Please help. I am very good with calculus, it comes very easily to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What kind of (specific) physics/mathematical background do you have? It depends on where you're starting from.
For intermediate physics, I learned using "Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems" by Thornton and Marion.
For electricity and magnetism, "Introduction to Electrodynamics," by Griffiths.
For quantum mechanics, "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics," by Griffiths.
All of these books have been very helpful for me. I find that the most effective way to teach yourself is to read the book, work problems, and ask your professors questions (but this should come as part of your classes as well).

I do have one other question, though. Why not just learn from your physics courses? Extracurricular learning is great, but you ought to have a full plate with your classes in Mech E and physics. Save the extra load for when you're done with your physics classes or for when you're sure you'll have free time. Most of these books are significant investments (expensive textbooks), so you'll want to be sure you will derive some benefit from them before buying.
 
anlon said:
What kind of (specific) physics/mathematical background do you have? It depends on where you're starting from.
For intermediate physics, I learned using "Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems" by Thornton and Marion.
For electricity and magnetism, "Introduction to Electrodynamics," by Griffiths.
For quantum mechanics, "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics," by Griffiths.
All of these books have been very helpful for me. I find that the most effective way to teach yourself is to read the book, work problems, and ask your professors questions (but this should come as part of your classes as well).

I do have one other question, though. Why not just learn from your physics courses? Extracurricular learning is great, but you ought to have a full plate with your classes in Mech E and physics. Save the extra load for when you're done with your physics classes or for when you're sure you'll have free time. Most of these books are significant investments (expensive textbooks), so you'll want to be sure you will derive some benefit from them before buying.
I'm not taking a physics course yet, not till next semester, so I'm roughly a month and a half away from taking one. And I just find a huge passion for physics like I want to know nearly everything about it. I want to not just learn physics, I want to perfect it. That's why I want to go over books and learn a lot. @anlon
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top