What can I consider 'fundamental definitions'?

  • Thread starter oddjobmj
  • Start date
  • #1
306
0
What are considered fundamental definitions? For context, a question was posed where the prof. provided parametric equations for the motion of a satellite in orbit and said that we can use the provided equations, fundamental definitions, and no other equations to solve the problems.

What does that mean?

I thought I had an idea of what that meant but a part of the question asks for us to solve for momentum but none of the parametric equations contain momentum explicitly which means we have to use -some other relationship- to introduce momentum to the system of equations. So, I thought I would pose that question here and see what you guys think.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,833
956
Well, if the problem asks for "momentum", the definition of momentum would be pretty fundamental wouldn't it?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
306
0
Absolutely, but that doesn't help me work out what relationships are fundamental. I say this because if we suppose that all relationship that are necessary to solve the problem are fundamental we get nowhere because even then I can't know which are fundamental until I know how to solve the problem. Is it truly this arbitrary or is there some sort of distinction that I can use to at least make a reasonable argument that something is fundamental?
 
  • #4
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,028
4,851
I'd ask your professor exactly what they mean by "fundamental definitions". Our opinions here could be entirely different from what he actually meant.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Related Threads on What can I consider 'fundamental definitions'?

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
982
  • Last Post
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
803
Replies
20
Views
7K
Top