MHB What can I say about y-uniform continuity

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that a continuous function f: R → R, which approaches zero outside a certain range, is uniformly continuous. The initial approach correctly identifies that f is uniformly continuous on the compact interval [-M, M] and establishes conditions for points both inside and outside this interval. The challenge arises when considering cases where one point is inside [-M, M] and the other is outside. A suggested solution is to expand the interval to [-(M+1), M+1] and choose a delta less than 1, ensuring both points are either within the expanded interval or outside the original one, thus simplifying the continuity argument. The discussion highlights the importance of managing the boundary cases in uniform continuity proofs.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wasntme)

I am looking at the following exercise:

Let $f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ a continuous function with the following property:
$\forall \epsilon >0 \exists M=M( \epsilon)>0 \text{ such that if } |x| \geq M \text{ then } |f(x)|< \epsilon$.
Show that $ f$ is uniformly continuous.

That's what I have tried so far:

Let $\epsilon'>0$

  • $x,y \in [-M,M] :$

    $f$ is continuous on $[-M,M]$,so $f$ is also uniformly continuous on this interval.So,$\exists \delta=\delta(\epsilon')>0 \text{ such that } \forall x,y \in [-M,M] \text{ with } |x-y|<\delta , \text{ we have } |f(x)-f(y)|< \epsilon'$
  • $x,y \geq M:$
    $\exists \delta=\delta(\epsilon')>0 \text{ such that } \forall x,y \in [M,+\infty) \text{ with } |x-y|<\delta \text{ we have } |f(x)-f(y)| \leq |f(x)|+|f(y)|<2 \epsilon'$
  • $x,y \leq -M: $
    $\exists \delta=\delta(\epsilon')>0 \text{ such that } \forall x,y \in (-\infty,-M] \text{ with } |x-y|<\delta \text{ we have } |f(x)-f(y)| \leq |f(x)|+|f(y)|<2 \epsilon'$

Is it right so far,or have I done something wrong? :confused: (Thinking)

Also,then I have to check the cases $x<-M<y$ and $x<M<y$

For the case $x<-M<y$,that's what I have done:

$x<-M \Rightarrow |f(x)|< \epsilon' $

But,what can I say about $y$,in order to conclude that $|f(x)-f(y)|< \epsilon'$ ? (Thinking) (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wasntme)

I am looking at the following exercise:

Let $f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ a continuous function with the following property:
$\forall \epsilon >0 \exists M=M( \epsilon)>0 \text{ such that if } |x| \geq M \text{ then } |f(x)|< \epsilon$.
Show that $ f$ is uniformly continuous.

That's what I have tried so far:

Let $\epsilon'>0$

  • $x,y \in [-M,M] :$

    $f$ is continuous on $[-M,M]$,so $f$ is also uniformly continuous on this interval.So,$\exists \delta=\delta(\epsilon')>0 \text{ such that } \forall x,y \in [-M,M] \text{ with } |x-y|<\delta , \text{ we have } |f(x)-f(y)|< \epsilon'$
  • $x,y \geq M:$
    $\exists \delta=\delta(\epsilon')>0 \text{ such that } \forall x,y \in [M,+\infty) \text{ with } |x-y|<\delta \text{ we have } |f(x)-f(y)| \leq |f(x)|+|f(y)|<2 \epsilon'$
  • $x,y \leq -M: $
    $\exists \delta=\delta(\epsilon')>0 \text{ such that } \forall x,y \in (-\infty,-M] \text{ with } |x-y|<\delta \text{ we have } |f(x)-f(y)| \leq |f(x)|+|f(y)|<2 \epsilon'$

Is it right so far,or have I done something wrong? :confused: (Thinking)

Also,then I have to check the cases $x<-M<y$ and $x<M<y$

For the case $x<-M<y$,that's what I have done:

$x<-M \Rightarrow |f(x)|< \epsilon' $

But,what can I say about $y$,in order to conclude that $|f(x)-f(y)|< \epsilon'$ ? (Thinking) (Thinking)
This problem is similar to the one in http://mathhelpboards.com/analysis-50/bounded-derivative-uniform-continuity-10997.html, and you have already provided most of the solution. The remaining part of the problem is to deal with the case where one of the points $x,y$ lies inside the interval $[-M,M]$ and the other one lies outside it. My suggestion is to use the fact that $f$ is (uniformly) continuous on the interval $[-(M+1),M+1]$, and then to choose your $\delta$ to be less than $1$. Then both of $x$ and $y$ will either be inside the "expanded" interval $[-(M+1),M+1]$ or outside the original interval $[-M,M]$. So you will no longer have the problem of one point being inside the interval and the other one outside it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K