What Causes a Sledge to Accelerate on Rails in Physics?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
Brewer
Messages
203
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


q4.jpg


The first question asks:
Which (fictitious) force will cause the sledge to accelerate along the rails? Give the modulus and direction of the sledge at distance r<R from the centre.

The next question asks:
Obtain an expression for the displacement r(t) for r<R, starting from the acceleration, and the initial condition r(0) = [tex]r_0[/tex].



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


a) Centrifugal force is the fictious force that causes the sled to accelerate. The acceleration is given by [tex]\omega^2 * r[/tex].

b) Now this is where I get most stuck.

So far I have said that [tex]a = \frac{d^2r}{dt^2}[/tex], so I integrated twice and ended up with the basic kinematic equation [tex]r = ut + \frac{1}{2}at^2[/tex] (which I would have guessed, but integrated as I assumed that's what the question was hinting at).
From here I said that u = 0, and was left with [tex]r = \omega^2rt^2 + r_0[/tex], but I'm a little confused about this. Surely r cannot be on both sides of the equation at the same time. As I've been writing this I've also thought about using [tex]\frac{v^2}{r}[/tex] instead of [tex]\omega^2r[/tex], but on further thought I end up with the same problem of having r on both sides of the equation (it would now be multiplied by the constant term), as well as having the v term that is never mentioned in the question itself (I know I probably could use it, but further questions relate to omega so I have this gut feeling that I should stick with omega in this question).

Any thoughts about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The acceleration is not constant. You integrated [tex]\frac{d^2r}{dt^2}[/tex] assuming it was constant.

You gave the correct acceleration in part (a):

[tex]\frac{d^2r}{dt^2} = \omega^2 r[/tex]
 
I just had the thought, that going from [tex]\frac{d^2r}{dt^2} = \omega^2r[/tex] that you could say that [tex]r=e^{at}[/tex] and put it back into the equation. From this and the initial conditions it emerges that [tex]r=r_{0}e^{\omega t}[/tex].

I think that makes a little more sense to me.
 
Last edited:
Yes, that's how to solve linear second order differential equations :approve:
 
Never dawned on me that that's what the problem was referring to. I naturally assumed that the acceleration was constant. Makes lots of sense now.