What causes the centripetal acceleration of the earth?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the causes of centripetal acceleration experienced by a person on the surface of the Earth, exploring the roles of gravitational and normal forces in the context of circular motion. Participants examine the implications of these forces in both inertial and rotating frames of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that for uniform circular motion, a centripetal force is required, questioning what provides this force for a person on Earth since gravity and normal force appear to cancel each other out.
  • Another participant argues that the laboratory frame is rotating, thus introducing a centrifugal force that must be considered, which affects the perceived weight (normal force) measured as gravity.
  • A participant proposes that the centripetal force must be supplied by gravity, suggesting that the normal force is less than gravity by the amount of centripetal force needed.
  • Another participant challenges the use of the term "centripetal force," suggesting that it is better to refer to the net force acting on the person, which includes both gravitational and normal forces.
  • One participant seeks confirmation that it is valid to analyze the situation using centripetal force, acknowledging it as a net force rather than a distinct force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the terminology and conceptualization of forces involved in centripetal acceleration. There is no consensus on the best way to frame the discussion, with multiple competing perspectives remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the forces involved, including the effects of rotating frames and the definitions of forces like centripetal and centrifugal. The discussion reflects a nuanced understanding of how these forces interact without reaching a definitive conclusion.

gsingh2011
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
For a body to undergo uniform circular motion, a centripetal force which is perpendicular to the velocity at all times must be applied to the body. For the moon and the earth, the gravitational force exerted on the moon by the Earth causes the moon to move in a circle instead of continue on a straight path. A similar example is a ball on a string. When the ball is moving in a circle parallel to the ground, the centripetal acceleration is caused by the tension in the string. So what causes the centripetal acceleration of a person on the earth? The reason I'm confused is because the force of gravity on a person is exactly canceled out by the normal force. If it wasn't, then that person would either move up or move down. So if those two forces cancel out, what is the force perpendicular to our velocity that keeps us moving in a circle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi gsingh2011! :smile:
gsingh2011 said:
… The reason I'm confused is because the force of gravity on a person is exactly canceled out by the normal force.

no it isn't …

although we usually treat the "laboratory frame" as inertial, the laboratory is actually rotating once every 24 hours, and therefore strictly speaking we should include a centrifugal force in that frame

that centrifugal force is the difference between gravity and N

however, when we measure the weight of something, we always actually measure N anyway, in other words the figure we use for g already has the centrifugal force subtracted from it!

ie, our 9.81 is really a combination of gravity and centrifugal force :wink:
 
Hi tiny-tim,

Is this a valid approach? -

The centripetal force applied to a person on the surface of the Earth must be supplied by gravity, the only inward-pointing force. However, this must be a NET inward force, meaning that the normal force from the Earth must be less than gravity by a value equal to the centripetal force (N=Fg-Fc).
You get the same result: "we always actually measure N anyway, in other words the figure we use for g already has the centrifugal force subtracted from it."
 
Hi I_wonder_why! :smile:
I_wonder_why said:
The centripetal force applied to a person on the surface of the Earth must be supplied by gravity, the only inward-pointing force. However, this must be a NET inward force, meaning that the normal force from the Earth must be less than gravity by a value equal to the centripetal force (N=Fg-Fc).

This is very confused …

the problem is that you're using the term "centripetal force"

this is best avoided unless there's one and only one force with a centripetal or centrifugal component …

in this case, the centripetal acceleration is supplied by the NET force of gravity and N …

it would be more logical to call that net force the centripetal force, but it would be best to avoid the term completely …

in an inertial frame, you can say that the normal force from the Earth must be less than gravity by a value equal to the mass times the centripetal acceleration (N=Fg-mv2/r)

in the rotating frame, you can say that the normal force from the Earth must be less than gravity by a value equal to the centrifugal force (N=Fg-mv2/r)
 
"in an inertial frame, you can say that the normal force from the Earth must be less than gravity by a value equal to the mass times the centripetal acceleration (N=Fg-mv2/r) "

This is what I was saying, I just wanted to be sure that it's equally valid to look at this only using centripetal force (understanding that it's not a separate force but a net force of gravity minus N).

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K