What causes the force of attraction between two permanent magnets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter so-crates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Magnets
AI Thread Summary
The force of attraction between two permanent magnets is primarily due to the net magnetic field created by unpaired electron spins, rather than moving charges as described by F = qv x B. In most materials, atomic currents are randomly oriented, resulting in a net force of zero, but in ferromagnetic materials, these currents can become organized, leading to a net magnetic force. The electrons, particularly the valence electrons, are bound to the atoms and contribute to the magnetism through their spins, which act as magnetic dipoles. The strength of the magnetic field produced by these dipoles decreases with the cube of the distance between them, and the interaction can be described by the potential energy of a dipole in a magnetic field. Ultimately, the forces between these dipoles are rooted in the principles of the Lorentz force.
so-crates
Messages
293
Reaction score
0
What causes the force of attraction between two permanent magnets? I'm well aware that F = qv x B, but what charges are moving?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Charges are moving at the atomic level. In most materials the atomic currents (i.e. from spin & angular momentum) are randomly oriented so the net force is zero. However, in some materials, the atomic currents can become organized (correlated) on a macroscopic level and allow for a net magnetic force on the material.
 
So it is the valence electrons in the metal, and not the nuclei? If it just the electrons, why does this cause a force on the entire piece of metal and not just cause a current to flow ?
 
so-crates said:
So it is the valence electrons in the metal, and not the nuclei? If it just the electrons, why does this cause a force on the entire piece of metal and not just cause a current to flow ?

The electrons are bound to the atoms.
 
Magnetism in permanent magnets results from the net magnetic field created by unpaired electron spins. These are not necessarily moving; some of the magnetism can come from orbital motion, but this is not the main effect. Electron spins are dipoles and there is a force law between these spins that is proportional to the magnetic moment of each and to the reciprocal of the cube of the separation. This force law is not F=qvxB.
 
krab said:
Electron spins are dipoles and there is a force law between these spins that is proportional to the magnetic moment of each and to the reciprocal of the cube of the separation. This force law is not F=qvxB.

Actually, the strength of the magnetic field produced by the dipole varies inversely with the cube of distance and the potential energy of a dipole in a magnetic field is U = -\vec \mu \cdot \vec B so the force exerted by one dipole on the other will vary as the gradient of U.

BTW - if we think about the magnetic moment of an electron classically then it amounts to a rotating charge, i.e. it constitutes an electrical current. Ultimately, these notions and forces between dipoles derive from the basic Lorentz force.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top