What Constant Acceleration is Needed to Safely Pass an RV on a Two-Lane Highway?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the constant acceleration needed for a car to safely pass an RV on a two-lane highway while considering the speeds of the vehicles involved and the distances between them. The scenario includes specific measurements such as the lengths of the vehicles and their speeds, as well as the required clearance during the maneuver.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of kinematic equations to find acceleration, with some questioning the initial approach and calculations. There is a focus on unit conversion and the importance of consistent reference frames. The original poster considers the time needed to pass the RV and how to set up the problem correctly.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different methods and interpretations. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of reference frames and the need for multiple position-time equations. There is an ongoing dialogue about the implications of different coordinate systems and the calculations required.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential rounding errors when converting units and the challenge of determining the correct time frame for the passing maneuver. The problem does not provide explicit information about time, which adds complexity to the calculations.

Kot
Messages
57
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


You are driving along a two lane high way at 50 mph. An approaching car traveling 50 mph the other way is a quarter mile ahead of you. You wish to pass a 40 ft long RV going 40 mph with its rear bumper 70 ft in front of your front bumper. Your car is 12 ft long. What constant acceleration would allow you to pass the RV and change back into your lane just as the bumpers of the RV and on-coming car are exactly your car's length apart, assuming the other vehicles remain at constant speed? What is the answer if you provide 70 ft of clearance between your car and each of the other two vehicles?

Homework Equations


##x=x_0+v_0t+\frac{1}{2}at^2\\ v^2=v_0^2+2a(x-x_0)##

The Attempt at a Solution


I used the second equation to find the acceleration of my car. (50mph)^2 = 2a(122ft)
I used 122ft for the final position of my car because my car is 70ft away from the RV, the length of my car is 12ft, and the length of the RV is 40ft which is a total of 122ft. I solved for a which is acceleration and got $54347.83 mi/h^2$ which seemed a little big. I converted it to seconds and got 15.1 mi/s^2. Is this the correct way to approach this problem?

*edit could someone PM me how to use LaTex commands on this forum? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll give you a quick LaTeX primer ... use the "quote" button to see the markup.

kinematic equations:
##x=x_0+v_0t+\frac{1}{2}at^2\\ v^2=v_0^2+2a(x-x_0)##

Kinematic problems are usually best solved in conjunction with a v-t diagram.
I cannot tell from what you wrote, but to get an answer for acceleration in mi/hr2 you must make sure that all lengths are in miles and all times are in hours. Off the problem statement, that means converting that 122ft to miles.

A useful unit for the situation would me velocity/time .. or mph/s (miles-per-hour-per-second).
 
I'll give you a quick LaTeX primer ... use the "quote" button to see the markup.

kinematic equations:
##x=x_0+v_0t+\frac{1}{2}at^2\\ v^2=v_0^2+2a(x-x_0)##

Kinematic problems are usually best solved in conjunction with a v-t diagram.
I cannot tell from what you wrote, but to get an answer for acceleration in mi/hr2 you must make sure that all lengths are in miles and all times are in hours. Off the problem statement, that means converting that 122ft to miles.

I suspect there is something up with your calculations - cannot tell for sure without doing the problem.

A useful unit for the situation would be velocity/time .. or mph/s (miles-per-hour-per-second).
But it may work better to use feet and seconds for everything.
 
Kot said:
I used the second equation to find the acceleration of my car. (50mph)^2 = 2a(122ft)
That will give you the acceleration needed to reach 50mph from a standing start in 122ft. You haven't used the initial quarter mile separation at all, which should be a clue that this is not right. Have another go.
 
I converted all the units into SI units. I know that my initial velocity is 22.35m/s, my displacement is 36.85m (distance to change lanes when oncoming cars bumper is 3.66m from RVs bumper), I do not think I need time since this problem doesn't give any information about time, I cannot seem to find the final velocity of my car, and I am looking for the acceleration. I only know 2 of the kinematic variables but I need 3 to be able to solve an equation. Will I have to setup an equation for each car and the RV?
 
Then you need another equation. You have a certain amount of time to pass the RV ... what determines that time? What haven't you used?

Converting to SI units will risk rounding errors.
I'd use feet and seconds, and keep fractions where they give big decimals.

I wouldn't think about setting up equations - start with the physics, the rest will follow.
I would do this in the frame of reference of the RV. Put x=0 on one of the RVs bumpers.
 
The certain amount of time to pass the RV is when the oncoming car reaches my cars length apart from the RV? I set the origin from the bumper of my car. Should I switch it to the front bumper of the RV?
 
Well, you can set any coordinates you like.

I suspect you have the coordinate axis fixed to the road, with x=0 at the position of your front bumper at t=0.
Your front bumper does not stay there: you are moving.

In this system there are three things moving, one of them is going to accelerate. The only thing staying still (the road) is something you don't care about. Using this one, the distance your front bumper has to go is the distance between you and the RV, plus the length of the RV, plus the length of your car, plus the distance the RV travels in all that time.

This means you need 3 position-time equations, and two equations describing the conditions.

Headache much?

If you fix the coordinate system to the RV, then it turns the problem of having to overtake a moving vehicle with the simpler one of having to overtake a stationary vehicle. On top of which, the relative speeds turn out to be nice(ish) numbers in ft/s ;)

Don't get me wrong, there is no "right" way to do this.
Pick one and we'll use it OK? Play to your strengths.
 
Kot said:
The certain amount of time to pass the RV is when the oncoming car reaches my cars length apart from the RV?
Yes
I set the origin from the bumper of my car. Should I switch it to the front bumper of the RV?
It doesn't matter where you set the origin as long as you are consistent.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Yes
It doesn't matter where you set the origin as long as you are consistent.

So I would have to take into account the amount of time and make sure that my acceleration would allow my car to pass the RV before that time?
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
Yes
It doesn't matter where you set the origin as long as you are consistent.
... but it does matter which reference frame you pick.

Kot said:
So I would have to take into account the amount of time and make sure that my acceleration would allow my car to pass the RV before that time?
... yep, you want to keep the coordinate axis fixed to the road?

write out the postion-time equations for each moving object.
 
  • #12
Simon Bridge said:
... but it does matter which reference frame you pick.

... yep, you want to keep the coordinate axis fixed to the road?

write out the postion-time equations for each moving object.


I'm a little confused as to why it matters which reference frame I choose, could you please explain? Thanks.
 
  • #13
*edit sorry double post
 
Last edited:
  • #14
I'm a little confused as to why it matters which reference frame I choose, could you please explain? Thanks.
Changes the speeds you use... depending on where the axis is attached.

i.e. in the RV reference frame, the RV is stationary, you are doing +10mph and the oncoming car is doing -90mph.
But those speeds are the same whether you put the origin on the front or rear bumpers of the RV, or 12ft ahead of the RV.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K