What constitutes a published philosopher

  • Thread starter Thread starter pftest
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the criteria for identifying a "published" philosopher within the context of new forum rules. A philosopher is generally considered published if they have a paper in one of the journals listed in the master journal list. If their work appears in a different publication, it's advisable to contact the forum Mentor for clarification. Participants express concern about potential infractions when starting topics without proper references. Overall, as long as users show intent to adhere to the rules, infractions are unlikely.
pftest
Messages
249
Reaction score
0
what constitutes a "published" philosopher

In the new philosophy forum rules, it has this requirement:
When starting a new topic, you must reference a published philosopher or researcher who has worked on the topic. The idea is to focus the topic along the lines of a specific area of research or school of thought.

So if i were to open a topic, how do i know if a philosopher is "published"?

Does he have to have a paper in one of the journals of the master journal list?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Im asking because now its unclear if you will get an infraction when opening a topic.
 


If he has a paper in the Master Journal list, that would be acceptable. If the paper/publication is elsewhere, send a PM to the Mentor in charge of the relevant forum (MIH, in this case) and check.

Whatever you do, you're not likely to get an infraction as long as you indicate a desire to respect the forum rules.
 


Ok sounds good, thank you.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top